Planning: Onshore Wind Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Elystan-Morgan

Main Page: Lord Elystan-Morgan (Crossbench - Life peer)

Planning: Onshore Wind

Lord Elystan-Morgan Excerpts
Thursday 6th June 2013

(10 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Hanham Portrait Baroness Hanham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I do not think that this Government or the previous Government ever pretended or thought that wind power was ever going to provide for all our energy needs. Therefore, this is part and parcel of the package that we need to take us into the future. That also includes nuclear and coal, which are still there. I come from the north-east so I appreciate what impact mines have, but until we are clearer about the need for energy they probably will not be abandoned.

Lord Elystan-Morgan Portrait Lord Elystan-Morgan
- Hansard - -

The noble Baroness has assured us that the impact upon aesthetic values and considerations will indeed be very relevant. Can she say whether that will be a peripheral or a central and fundamental consideration? If so, how will these fundamental considerations be valued one against another; in other words, who will come to that almost impossible Solomonic decision?

Baroness Hanham Portrait Baroness Hanham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I do not want to get tempted into discussing what the guidance will say. The point the noble Lord has raised is central. However, we have made it clear that the aesthetic as well as the heritage impact will be relevant to what the guidance says. I will make sure that what the noble Lord has asked is taken into account.