Olympic Games 2012: Tickets Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Dubs

Main Page: Lord Dubs (Labour - Life peer)

Olympic Games 2012: Tickets

Lord Dubs Excerpts
Monday 4th July 2011

(12 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Asked By
Lord Dubs Portrait Lord Dubs
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many Olympic tickets have been allocated without ballot and what organisations and individuals are to receive them.

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, 2.2 million Olympic tickets—that is, one quarter of the total—are allocated separately from the UK public application process. Within that, 12 per cent are for purchase by the 205 national Olympic committees, 8 per cent are for purchase by sponsors and stakeholders—global and domestic—and 5 per cent are for purchase by the International Olympic Committee, international federations and other global sports bodies, international broadcast rights holders and prestige ticketing partners. This reflects the host city agreement signed with the IOC in 2005.

Lord Dubs Portrait Lord Dubs
- Hansard - -

My Lords, in this instance, the Minister’s Answer makes the whole thing sound even worse than I thought. She will be aware that there is an enormous sense of unfairness among people in this country about the way the tickets have been allocated. Will she confirm that the DCMS is getting 8,815 tickets? I put it to her that the best way of allocating tickets would have been to give every applicant two tickets before multiple applications were dealt with?

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the government allocation is 8,815 tickets, which is 0.1 per cent of the tickets available. I will not go into the detail of how that breaks down at the moment. On the allocation of the tickets, no one had ever before attempted to sell 3 million tickets at one go. Trying to weight applications would have added a layer of complexity which would have made the whole thing almost impossible. LOCOG had no way of knowing how many applications would come in, so it followed other rules rather than the weighting one.