Prisoners: Imprisonment for Public Protection Sentences Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Prisoners: Imprisonment for Public Protection Sentences

Lord Dholakia Excerpts
Wednesday 11th November 2015

(8 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Evans of Bowes Park Portrait Baroness Evans of Bowes Park
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord will be aware that it is not mandatory for IPP prisoners to complete specific courses and programmes before they can be considered for parole. In fact, the sentencing planning guidance reinforces the Parole Board’s general obligation to consider the offender’s risk level, so that it can also look at broader evidence such as training and education, specialist support and demonstrating a sustained period of stable behaviour.

Lord Dholakia Portrait Lord Dholakia (LD)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, one of the successes of the coalition Government was the abolition of the IPP, which applies to current and future offenders but not to those already in the system. Will the Minister confirm that there are serious delays in the assessment process, including delays at parole hearings, resulting in inmates remaining in our prisons often years after their release dates? What steps are being taken to end this injustice? Surely, if the Secretary of State is serious about reducing the prison population, he should deal with the anomaly that the abolition of IPP sentences has created for those in custody now.