Railways: Passenger Demand Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Railways: Passenger Demand

Lord Davies of Oldham Excerpts
Thursday 31st October 2013

(11 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Kramer Portrait Baroness Kramer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Government—and I—regard HS2 as a vital project. As I said, the underlying rationale is capacity. We are out of capacity on critical lines going north out of London and those are essential for the economy. We must also continue to build the economy of the north of England rather than just constantly focus on the south. I believe that the project has found a good balance between the environmental challenges—of course, they are many—and value for money. This is an absolutely essential project and most of those in this House who specialise and focus on transport and rail will confirm the view I have just expressed.

Lord Davies of Oldham Portrait Lord Davies of Oldham (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, why is the public operation of the east coast main line not allowed to continue or bid for the franchise when bids from the German and French state railways appear to be welcome?

Baroness Kramer Portrait Baroness Kramer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am delighted to find that HS2 has now become so uncontroversial that questions on other topics enter into this brief exchange. I just repeat what I said on the future of the east coast main line. It has gone through a period of being stabilised by the Government. That has meant that new investment has not come in on the scale that passengers on that route require. We wish to see a strong future for the east coast main line.