Debates between Lord Coaker and Earl Attlee during the 2024 Parliament

Defence: 2.5% GDP Spending Commitment

Debate between Lord Coaker and Earl Attlee
Tuesday 17th December 2024

(4 weeks, 1 day ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Coaker Portrait Lord Coaker (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Let us be clear: there is no question of the deterrent not being renewed. This is the problem we have: we have heard the figure of 3%, and now the noble Lord seems to be suggesting 5%. I know that he is committed to defence, as we all are, but there is a question about how much we spend on it. This Government have made a commitment to setting a pathway to 2.5%. In these debates, we should also recognise the huge contribution our country has made to defending peace and democracy in Ukraine, under both the previous Government—the noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, and other former Ministers—and this Government. Sometimes, as well as asking why we do not spend more, we should also recognise what the previous Government did and what this Government are doing for Ukraine. That gives a bit of perspective.

Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, does the Minister agree that when we rearmed in the 1950s, we deterred aggression and avoided conflict?

Lord Coaker Portrait Lord Coaker (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I absolutely agree with the point about deterrence, and I have been making it in various debates. The noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, has been present at those debates, and the noble Lord, Lord Dannatt, asked me about this during the previous Urgent Question we had on defence. We need to re-establish deterrence. We need people to know that there are lines which, if crossed, will result in consequences. Perhaps we have not given the priority to deterrence that we should have, but the noble Earl is right that it must play an appropriate part in future. Countries know that, with our allies, we stand up for certain things and that if those lines are crossed, there will be consequences.

Decommissioned Nuclear-Powered Submarines

Debate between Lord Coaker and Earl Attlee
Wednesday 23rd October 2024

(2 months, 3 weeks ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, are the older submarines more difficult to recycle than the Swiftsure class?

Lord Coaker Portrait Lord Coaker (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

We will understand that more fully once we have finished the demonstrator project with HMS “Swiftsure”.