Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Clinton-Davis

Main Page: Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour - Life peer)

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Lord Clinton-Davis Excerpts
Thursday 6th November 2014

(10 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Asked by
Lord Clinton-Davis Portrait Lord Clinton-Davis
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have any plans to introduce tighter rules governing larger unmanned aerial vehicles and also to introduce legislation to enhance security measures against such aircraft at ground level.

Lord Popat Portrait Lord Popat (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, as with all aircraft, larger remotely piloted aircraft systems will be permitted to operate in UK airspace only if it is considered that it is safe for them to do so. The Government are working closely with our European partners to put in place the necessary legal and regulatory framework to enable the full and safe integration of remotely piloted aircraft into the total aviation system, and thus share the same airspace as manned aviation.

Lord Clinton-Davis Portrait Lord Clinton-Davis (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I declare my interest as the life president of BALPA. What discussions have taken place between the Government and the pilots’ union about the expansion of drone use? Have not BALPA and others expressed serious concerns about the adequacy of plans to ensure security, especially when drones are on the ground and also when they might be in the hands of terrorists? Will the Government address the anxieties before long?

Lord Popat Portrait Lord Popat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, of course the Government will address them. The same argument always comes out when a new form of transport is developed—as it did with trains, cars and aeroplanes. It comes down to two questions. First, do the benefits of the new industry, economic and otherwise, outweigh the possible negatives as regards safety, security and privacy? Secondly, are we confident that we are regulating enough to ensure safety but not regulating too much so that we harm the new industry, which is very lucrative?