Bill of Rights Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Bruce of Bennachie

Main Page: Lord Bruce of Bennachie (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 23rd June 2022

(1 year, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Bellamy Portrait Lord Bellamy (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Indeed, my Lords, I warmly welcome the prospect of the full, frank and very free debate we shall have in this House—an informed and instructive debate. The Government will be listening very carefully to the points made.

Lord Bruce of Bennachie Portrait Lord Bruce of Bennachie (LD)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, is the ability to appeal to the Strasbourg court for very many people more theoretical than real? The court is understaffed; it takes a great deal of time to get there and a great deal of money to process a case. In reality, are many people not being denied their human rights, in all practical purposes, because the right of appeal is only theoretical for them?

Lord Bellamy Portrait Lord Bellamy (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My friend—the noble Lord—is quite right that the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg is grappling with enormous problems. That is why the Government take the view that the vast majority of cases are better dealt with in our own jurisdiction, which is familiar to the general public and in which the public and the Government have confidence. The orientation towards cases being dealt with here in the UK is both pragmatic and right in principle.