Roads: Illegal Motorway Advertisements Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville

Main Page: Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville (Conservative - Life peer)

Roads: Illegal Motorway Advertisements

Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville Excerpts
Wednesday 21st July 2010

(14 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, in my opinion most of these advertisements are illegal but the difficulty is one of enforcement. An advertisement on a vehicle is not subject to control under the 2007 regulations, provided the vehicle is normally used as a moving vehicle and is not used principally for the display of advertisements. When a vehicle is used principally for the display of an advertisement and is parked in one place for a prolonged period, the land can be regarded as a site for the display of an advertisement and then would require express consent from the local planning authority.

Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville Portrait Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
- Hansard - -

My Lords, does my noble friend accept that the same hazards described by the noble Lord, Lord Harrison, can occur in road signs? I am thinking in particular of the one in Lincolnshire, which directs you “To Mavis Enderby and Old Bolingbroke”, under which somebody had written, “the gift of a child”.

Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am not familiar with that particular sign. The regulations we have in place are comprehensive, reasonable and effective and I pay tribute to the party opposite for the 2007 regulations.