Roads: Illegal Motorway Advertisements Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville

Main Page: Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville (Conservative - Life peer)

Roads: Illegal Motorway Advertisements

Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville Excerpts
Wednesday 21st July 2010

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, in my opinion most of these advertisements are illegal but the difficulty is one of enforcement. An advertisement on a vehicle is not subject to control under the 2007 regulations, provided the vehicle is normally used as a moving vehicle and is not used principally for the display of advertisements. When a vehicle is used principally for the display of an advertisement and is parked in one place for a prolonged period, the land can be regarded as a site for the display of an advertisement and then would require express consent from the local planning authority.

Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville Portrait Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
- Hansard - -

My Lords, does my noble friend accept that the same hazards described by the noble Lord, Lord Harrison, can occur in road signs? I am thinking in particular of the one in Lincolnshire, which directs you “To Mavis Enderby and Old Bolingbroke”, under which somebody had written, “the gift of a child”.

Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am not familiar with that particular sign. The regulations we have in place are comprehensive, reasonable and effective and I pay tribute to the party opposite for the 2007 regulations.