Young Offenders: Sentencing Guidelines Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Beecham

Main Page: Lord Beecham (Labour - Life peer)

Young Offenders: Sentencing Guidelines

Lord Beecham Excerpts
Thursday 16th March 2017

(7 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Asked by
Lord Beecham Portrait Lord Beecham
- Hansard - -

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they will take to assess the financial and other implications for probation and other relevant services of the introduction of new sentencing guidelines for young offenders.

Baroness Buscombe Portrait Baroness Buscombe (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, sentencing guidelines are produced by the independent Sentencing Council. The resource assessment produced by the council concludes that these revised guidelines will have no or minimal impact on resources to respond to offending by children and young people as they are intended to ensure a consistent approach to sentencing, not to make significant changes to practice.

Lord Beecham Portrait Lord Beecham (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the new sentencing guidelines for young offenders, with their emphasis on rehabilitation, are welcome, as is the recognition that many young offenders come from “deprived homes” and have,

“low educational attainment … experience of abuse and/or neglect … and the misuse of drugs and/or alcohol”.

Does this not suggest that, in addition to the work of an overstretched probation service, there needs to be greater investment in local health, education and children’s services with a view to preventing offending and promoting rehabilitation?

Baroness Buscombe Portrait Baroness Buscombe
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I entirely agree with what the noble Lord has said—and indeed I have good news on that front. First, let me say that the youth offending statistics are very encouraging. Since the creation of the youth justice system, the number of young people in that system has fallen dramatically. More attention has been paid in recent years to low-level offending by children. An example of what the Government see as an important response to the noble Lord’s question is that, as a result of Charlie Taylor’s review of the youth justice system, the Government have committed to developing two new secure schools as a pilot to accommodate young people who are currently being detained in youth offending institutions and secure training centres. There will be a strong focus on education and welfare. The schools will provide a new form of custodial provision with better outcomes for young people: in short, placing education at the heart of their detention to improve their life chances and deter reoffending.