Immigration: Brook House Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Immigration: Brook House

Lord Bates Excerpts
Wednesday 14th July 2010

(14 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord De Mauley Portrait Lord De Mauley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am sorry to disappoint the noble Lord, but today I am briefed specifically on Brook House. However, I will ensure that I write to him with an answer to his question.

Lord Bates Portrait Lord Bates
- Hansard - -

My Lords, does my noble friend agree that Brook House as a removal centre is designed to hold detainees for a maximum of three days, but the chief inspector’s report found that more than 17 per cent of the detainees there had been held for longer than three months? Will he look into why that is the case?

Lord De Mauley Portrait Lord De Mauley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, my Lords. It is the Government’s firm intention to keep the length of detention to the shortest possible period. However, in some cases detainees cause delays by failing to comply with the removal process, in particular by refusing to provide accurate information about their nationality and identity. While we always seek to release a person where there is no longer a realistic prospect of removal within a reasonable time frame, noble Lords will agree that we none the less have a duty to protect the public from those who pose a risk of harm, in particular those who have committed serious criminal offences. The vast majority of detainees at Brook House fall into this category. However, the Government are committed to finding ways of removing people more quickly.