United States: Trade Deal Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Anderson of Swansea

Main Page: Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 6th March 2019

(5 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Manzoor Portrait Baroness Manzoor
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Among the other things said by the US ambassador on the “Today” programme this morning, he stated: “I don’t think we would want to lower any of these standards but just want to have more trade between the US and the UK”. On agricultural scope, we are committed to negotiating a full and comprehensive free trade deal. That means discussing all areas of free trade. As with all negotiations, the US objectives on matters such as agriculture mark the starting point and not the end.

Lord Anderson of Swansea Portrait Lord Anderson of Swansea (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, it was all going to be so easy, according to Mr Fox and his friends, since when an amendment has been moved. Have the Government realised that they are now confronting a nationalist President who wants to do deals and that commerce is largely under the control of the Congress, whose members want to bring home the bacon to their own districts?

Baroness Manzoor Portrait Baroness Manzoor
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, once again, I do not agree. An ambitious UK-US free trade agreement will benefit the UK economy, improving access to the whole of the world’s largest, most dynamic economy. It will make it even easier for the UK and US to trade with each other and to invest in each other’s economies. Surely that is a good thing for our country.