British Nationality (Regularisation of Past Practice) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

British Nationality (Regularisation of Past Practice) Bill

Layla Moran Excerpts
2nd reading
Tuesday 6th June 2023

(1 year, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate British Nationality (Regularisation of Past Practice) Act 2023 Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Robert Jenrick Portrait The Minister for Immigration (Robert Jenrick)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

The Bill seeks to address a technical legal issue identified by the Home Office with a long-standing policy that operated from 1983 until the early 2000s under successive Governments of both parties, relating to the criteria for determining whether European economic area nationals living in the UK during that period were “settled”.

The concept of settlement is important. The British Nationality Act 1981 defines it as being ordinarily resident in the UK and without restriction on the period for which one may remain, and it is also referred to as “free from immigration time restrictions”. As many Members will know, the Act introduced changes for acquisition of citizenship, shifting from a “birth on soil” approach to a requirement for at least one parent to be British or settled in the UK at the time of the birth. Thus the issue of whether or not an individual is settled has a knock-on effect on the citizenship of any children born to that individual in the United Kingdom.

Layla Moran Portrait Layla Moran (Oxford West and Abingdon) (LD)
- Hansard - -

I thoroughly welcome the Bill. I have a constituent who falls into this category. She had to prove her nationality, although, having lived here for 33 years—this is the only country she ever knew, and English is the only language she has ever spoken—she did not even know that she was not British until she had to apply for a passport. She was estranged from her mother, and therefore found herself having to have very painful conversations with a family member to prove that she was what she had always thought she was. Does the Minister agree that the Bill will sort out issues of that kind?

Robert Jenrick Portrait Robert Jenrick
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I strongly agree with the hon. Lady. The Home Office would argue that her constituent has always been British and should be considered so, but there has been a degree of legal doubt following the recent case, so it was right that we brought forward this legislation at the earliest opportunity and that it is retrospective, so that all constituents who have been concerned can know that, clearly in law, they are and have always been British citizens.