All 1 Debates between Laura Farris and Alec Shelbrooke

Thu 18th Jun 2020
Parliamentary Constituencies bill (Second sitting)
Public Bill Committees

Committee stage: 2nd sitting & Committee Debate: 2nd sitting: House of Commons

Parliamentary Constituencies bill (Second sitting)

Debate between Laura Farris and Alec Shelbrooke
Committee stage & Committee Debate: 2nd sitting: House of Commons
Thursday 18th June 2020

(4 years, 5 months ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Parliamentary Constituencies Act 2020 View all Parliamentary Constituencies Act 2020 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Notices of Amendments as at 16 June 2020 - (17 Jun 2020)
Alec Shelbrooke Portrait Alec Shelbrooke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I just add that the last time, we were able to form much bigger constituency numbers.

Tom Adams: Yes, that change will have an impact.

Laura Farris Portrait Laura Farris (Newbury) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Q I want to pick up on the point about wards and to explore your answer. Is there any particular reason why you do not think that wards should be split? An ordinary member of the public in a city often does not know what ward they live in. Prior to becoming involved in politics, I was not really aware of where I lived. What is the democratic principle?

Tom Adams: It certainly creates challenges from the perspective of political parties and others who are reliant on electoral geography boundaries. Given that wards are created by local Boundary Commissions to have some sense of community ties, and they are created for a reason, if you split them you are further cutting community ties, and potentially creating more challenges, in the sense that people are cut off from people who they would see as firmly part of their community by cutting across a ward. Obviously, you cannot always come up with a perfect arrangement.