All 3 Debates between Kit Malthouse and Sajid Javid

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Kit Malthouse and Sajid Javid
Monday 17th July 2017

(7 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman will know that money is not the issue. We have already made it absolutely clear that we will do whatever it takes to find the victims of Grenfell Tower permanent homes. That is exactly what we are doing, but we will be led by the victims themselves, at their pace, on what they need.

Kit Malthouse Portrait Kit Malthouse (North West Hampshire) (Con)
- Hansard - -

T7. Overton, Oakley and Whitchurch in my constituency have produced really ambitious neighbourhood plans with generous housing targets, but those communities are now concerned about the infrastructure investment required to make the housing developments happen. What can the Minister do to help?

Housing White Paper

Debate between Kit Malthouse and Sajid Javid
Tuesday 7th February 2017

(7 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No one is saying that modular homes and factory build will be the panacea, but they do have an important contribution to make. Traditional building remains important and that will remain the case for many years to come. Part of trying to get more skills into the sector involves the apprenticeship levy, which comes into place in April. I was proud to introduce it as Business Secretary and have already heard about construction companies’ plans to take on more apprentices.

Kit Malthouse Portrait Kit Malthouse (North West Hampshire) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I welcome the standardisation of the calculation of housing supply for local authorities. Will the Secretary of State confirm that that means that no permission should be granted outside the envelope of approved local and neighbourhood plans?

Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is what it means.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Kit Malthouse and Sajid Javid
Tuesday 30th June 2015

(9 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Kit Malthouse Portrait Kit Malthouse (North West Hampshire) (Con)
- Hansard - -

T1. If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.

Sajid Javid Portrait The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and President of the Board of Trade (Sajid Javid)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

May I first pay tribute to my predecessor, the equally hirsute former Member for Twickenham? As part of the coalition Government, Dr Cable did a great deal to support British business.

Speaking of former members, I see that last month Lord Sugar resigned his membership of the Labour party, citing its negative business policies and general anti-enterprise approach. It seems that while the Government are busy creating 3 million more apprenticeships, Lord Sugar has told the Opposition that they are all fired.

Kit Malthouse Portrait Kit Malthouse
- Hansard - -

As a small businessman—I draw the attention of the House to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests—I welcome the Government’s work in the past four years to roll back the red tape that has dogged small businesses. Now that the Government are firmly in control of the Department, can Ministers reassures us that they will redouble their efforts? In particular, will they develop measurable targets, for cutting red tape and administration for small business, against which we can measure success?

Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I fully agree with my hon. Friend. We will continue to work very hard to cut regulations, building on the very successful red tape challenge in the previous Parliament and the policy of one in, two out. Cutting regulation for businesses is like a tax cut for those businesses. The only difference is that it does not cost the Exchequer anything, so we should cut as much regulation as possible.