Debates between Kit Malthouse and Phil Wilson during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Kit Malthouse and Phil Wilson
Monday 23rd July 2018

(6 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Kit Malthouse Portrait Kit Malthouse
- Hansard - -

The hon. Lady is definitely right to say that the solution to everybody’s housing problems is to build more homes—as many as we can—across those parts of the country that need it.

Phil Wilson Portrait Phil Wilson (Sedgefield) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

22. Whether he plans to introduce a regulator of private landlords; and if he will make statement.

Kit Malthouse Portrait The Minister for Housing (Kit Malthouse)
- Hansard - -

We are determined to crack down on the small number of rogue landlords—that includes banning the most serious offenders from letting properties. The database of rogue landlords and property agents supports local authority enforcement action. We have committed to requiring private landlords to join a mandatory redress scheme.

Phil Wilson Portrait Phil Wilson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have an indirect interest in this question, as my wife is a private landlord. Selective licensing schemes are good as far as they go, but a side effect is that they force bad landlords elsewhere. Therefore, whether we have a regulator or not, the answer, as outlined in my private Member’s Bill, is a national register of private landlords and licensing scheme to ensure that they provide the good-quality homes that people deserve. I know from working with Ron Hogg, Durham’s police and crime commissioner, of the effect that rogue private landlords have on local communities. Will the Secretary of State meet us both to discuss the need for a more robust approach to registration and licensing, both locally and nationally?

Kit Malthouse Portrait Kit Malthouse
- Hansard - -

I am more than happy to meet the hon. Gentleman to discuss the issues he raises, but I carefully suggest to him that this House has to strike a balance between bureaucracy and regulation—the two are often very different.