To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Legal Costs: Low Incomes
Friday 7th March 2025

Asked by: Kirith Entwistle (Labour - Bolton North East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent assessment she has made of the adequacy of the lower tier of the evidence provision fee in covering the legal costs of defendants on a low income.

Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

Defendants facing trial at the magistrates’ court or Crown Court may apply for legal aid to pay for their defence costs; this covers the cost of preparing the case and providing legal representation.

The evidence provision fee, which was introduced in 2010 alongside implementation of the Crown Court means testing scheme, applies in cases that are committed, sent or transferred for trial to the Crown Court and comprises a lower tier of £45 and an upper tier of £90. This fee remunerates defence solicitors for the extra work which may be incurred when collating evidence of the defendant’s income and capital resources required to complete the legal aid application at the Crown Court.

At the Crown Court, subject to the outcome of the financial means assessment, some defendants may be required to pay an income contribution towards their legal aid costs. This is paid on a monthly basis for a maximum six month period and will be refunded to the defendant with interest if they are acquitted or the Crown Prosecution Service withdraws due to insufficient evidence. If the defendant is convicted, they do not recoup any income contributions and may also be liable to pay any outstanding legal aid costs from their capital assets.

If a defendant does not qualify for legal aid, either because they do not pass the financial eligibility criteria or the ‘Interests of Justice’ (merits) test, they may choose to pay privately for their defence or to represent themselves. In circumstances where a privately funded defendant is acquitted or charges are dropped, they may seek to claim their defence costs back from central funds through a Defendant’s Costs Order. However, following changes introduced by the Coalition Government, the refund of defence costs has been based on legal aid rates.

There are a range of factors which may influence a defendant’s decision over whether to plead guilty. The drivers behind this decision will vary with the circumstances of each individual case.

Ministers are currently considering their preferred approach to the rules and arrangements governing legal aid financial eligibility.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 06 Mar 2025
International Women�s Day

Speech Link

View all Kirith Entwistle (Lab - Bolton North East) contributions to the debate on: International Women�s Day

Division Vote (Commons)
4 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) - View Vote Context
Kirith Entwistle (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 12 Noes - 4
Division Vote (Commons)
4 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) - View Vote Context
Kirith Entwistle (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 11 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 13 Noes - 4
Division Vote (Commons)
4 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context
Kirith Entwistle (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 4
Division Vote (Commons)
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Kirith Entwistle (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 326 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 339 Noes - 172
Division Vote (Commons)
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Kirith Entwistle (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 324 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 347
Division Vote (Commons)
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Kirith Entwistle (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 322 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 332
Division Vote (Commons)
3 Mar 2025 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Kirith Entwistle (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 331
Division Vote (Commons)
26 Feb 2025 - British Indian Ocean Territory - View Vote Context
Kirith Entwistle (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 287 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 298