To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Social Services: Gender Recognition
Thursday 24th June 2021

Asked by: Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party - East Lothian)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what plans he has to revise the Policy Framework guidance on The care and management of individuals who are transgender.

Answered by Alex Chalk - Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice

The Ministry of Justice and Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service policy framework 'The Care and Management of Individuals who are Transgender' was published in 2019. A routine review of the implementation and effectiveness of this policy is underway. The review will involve consultation with a range of internal and external stakeholders. We are working towards publishing refreshed policy and guidance in Spring 2022.

We will always ensure that transgender individuals are managed safely with their rights properly respected and in accordance with the law. We continue to consider all known risk factors when managing transgender offenders, including any risk to the person, risk to others and risk of self-harm.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 24 Nov 2020
Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [Lords]

Speech Link

View all Kenny MacAskill (Alba - East Lothian) contributions to the debate on: Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [Lords]

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 24 Nov 2020
Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [Lords]

Speech Link

View all Kenny MacAskill (Alba - East Lothian) contributions to the debate on: Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [Lords]

Written Question
Judicial Review: Northern Ireland and Scotland
Friday 11th September 2020

Asked by: Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party - East Lothian)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions he had with representatives of the judiciary in Scotland and Northern Ireland ahead of the announcement of the launch of the independent panel to look at judicial review on 31 July 2020.

Answered by Chris Philp - Minister of State (Home Office)

Letters were sent to the Lord President of Scotland and the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland on July 30th confirming the Panel’s details, prior to the announcement of the panel on July 31st.


Written Question
Judicial Review
Monday 7th September 2020

Asked by: Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party - East Lothian)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, who the independent panel considering judicial review will be consulting with.

Answered by Alex Chalk - Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice

The Independent Panel on Administrative Law commenced its work in July 2020 which is expected to run until the end of the year. The panel intends to gather evidence from a wide range of interested and representative parties including legal bodies, academia, professional associations, trade bodies, as well as from those who act for claimants and those who defend judicial reviews, amongst others. This will be a time limited exercise and anyone who wishes to submit comments or evidence may do so before the 19 October 2020. Details for how to submit are available on GOV.UK. A copy of the call for evidence will be deposited in the libraries of both Houses.


Written Question
Judicial Review
Monday 7th September 2020

Asked by: Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party - East Lothian)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the planned timescale is for the consultation period of the independent panel to look at judicial review.

Answered by Alex Chalk - Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice

The Independent Panel on Administrative Law commenced its work in July 2020 which is expected to run until the end of the year. The panel intends to gather evidence from a wide range of interested and representative parties including legal bodies, academia, professional associations, trade bodies, as well as from those who act for claimants and those who defend judicial reviews, amongst others. This will be a time limited exercise and anyone who wishes to submit comments or evidence may do so before the 19 October 2020. Details for how to submit are available on GOV.UK. A copy of the call for evidence will be deposited in the libraries of both Houses.


Written Question
Judicial Review
Monday 7th September 2020

Asked by: Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party - East Lothian)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions he had with representatives of the judiciary in England and Wales ahead of the announcement of the launch of the independent panel to look at judicial review on 31 July 2020.

Answered by Alex Chalk - Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice

The Lord Chancellor meets regularly with senior judges in England and Wales to discuss matters related to the administration of the justice system and the courts and tribunals.


Written Question
Prisons: Coronavirus
Tuesday 1st September 2020

Asked by: Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party - East Lothian)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, for what reasons the HM Prison and Probation Service has declared a moratorium on prison research during the period of covid-19 related solitary confinement; and if he will make an assessment of the (a) effects of confinement on individuals and (b) potential merits of different means of (i) ameliorating those effects and (ii) tackling future infections.

Answered by Lucy Frazer - Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport

As a result of the strong but necessary measures we introduced in prisons, lives have been saved and the NHS is being protected from the impact of widespread local outbreaks. The safety of our staff and those in our care remains our top priority, and social distancing is one of the most effective controls to reduce the transmission of infection.

HMPPS does not hold people in solitary confinement, but there are occasions where, for their own safety or that of others and in line with Prison Service Order 1700, prisoners are segregated from the main population of the prison. We have not changed this policy in response to Covid-19, and have therefore not put any prisoner into solitary confinement.

The response to the COVID-19 crisis has been guided by Public Health England and Wales advice. We have taken decisions to control the spread of infection across the estate, which has resulted in prisoners receiving less time out of their cells, compared to regimes before the pandemic. We recognise that the restrictions brought in to control the spread of infection must be proportionate, and we will continue to keep them under review. Our National Framework for Prison Regimes and Services, which has been guided by public health advice, sets out in detail how we will take decisions about easing coronavirus-related restrictions in prisons, while keeping staff and those in our care safe.

The National Research Committee (NRC) approves research to be conducted with staff and offenders across HMPPS. In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, the NRC has restricted the number of applications to conduct primary research across HMPPS until further notice; only applications to conduct high priority or urgent projects continue to be reviewed, including requests to access existing data for secondary analysis.

The decision was taken to prevent the spread of the virus, protect staff and those accommodated in prisons and to reduce the burden on prison resources while prisons operate under restricted regimes. The NRC restrictions will be kept under review and easement will be informed by the National Framework.


Written Question
Prisons: Coronavirus
Tuesday 1st September 2020

Asked by: Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party - East Lothian)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will commission independent research on the effects on prisoners of being placed in long-term solitary confinement in response to the covid-19 outbreak.

Answered by Lucy Frazer - Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport

As a result of the strong but necessary measures we introduced in prisons, lives have been saved and the NHS is being protected from the impact of widespread local outbreaks. The safety of our staff and those in our care remains our top priority, and social distancing is one of the most effective controls to reduce the transmission of infection.

HMPPS does not hold people in solitary confinement, but there are occasions where, for their own safety or that of others and in line with Prison Service Order 1700, prisoners are segregated from the main population of the prison. We have not changed this policy in response to Covid-19, and have therefore not put any prisoner into solitary confinement.

The response to the COVID-19 crisis has been guided by Public Health England and Wales advice. We have taken decisions to control the spread of infection across the estate, which has resulted in prisoners receiving less time out of their cells, compared to regimes before the pandemic. We recognise that the restrictions brought in to control the spread of infection must be proportionate, and we will continue to keep them under review. Our National Framework for Prison Regimes and Services, which has been guided by public health advice, sets out in detail how we will take decisions about easing coronavirus-related restrictions in prisons, while keeping staff and those in our care safe.

The National Research Committee (NRC) approves research to be conducted with staff and offenders across HMPPS. In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, the NRC has restricted the number of applications to conduct primary research across HMPPS until further notice; only applications to conduct high priority or urgent projects continue to be reviewed, including requests to access existing data for secondary analysis.

The decision was taken to prevent the spread of the virus, protect staff and those accommodated in prisons and to reduce the burden on prison resources while prisons operate under restricted regimes. The NRC restrictions will be kept under review and easement will be informed by the National Framework.


Written Question
Prisons: Coronavirus
Wednesday 24th June 2020

Asked by: Kenny MacAskill (Alba Party - East Lothian)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of prison staff (a) in administrative grades or (b) employed as instructional officers are currently (i) working remotely, (ii) shielding, or (iii) attending prison establishments, by grade; and if he will make a statement.

Answered by Lucy Frazer - Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport

The vast majority of operational staff in prisons continue to attend the workplace – for these staff we are providing Personal Protective Equipment where appropriate.

We are unable to provide data on the total number of prison staff working remotely as this data is collected by exception. However, we are able to provide the number of staff who are working from home and are unable fulfil all of their usual duties outside of their usual place of work for Covid-19 related reasons. We are also able to provide what data we do have as a proportion of our overall headcount of staff.

Of those, and as of 12 June, the number and proportion of public sector prison staff in administrative grades and employed as instructional officers working remotely or not working are as below:

Working from home

Not working

(a) in administrative grades

19

0%

336

7%

(b) instructional officers (excludes vocational instructors)

~

0%

98

8%

We do not hold information centrally on the number and proportion of prison staff who are shielding.

Data Sources & Quality

Source: HMPPS COVID-19 absences data collection

The symbol ~ denotes suppressed values of 3 or fewer (and totals that would allow values of 3 or fewer to be calculated) to avoid the risk of identifying individuals.

Excludes staff who have been reported absent from work but it is not clear if the staff member continues to work remotely or not.

These figures have been drawn from the HMPPS COVID-19 data collection. Care is taken when processing and analysing returns but the detail is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. Although shown to the last case, the figures may not be accurate to that level. This data has been self-reported and has not yet been checked against our central databases