Debates between Katherine Fletcher and Alec Shelbrooke during the 2019 Parliament

Tue 6th Jun 2023

Energy Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)

Debate between Katherine Fletcher and Alec Shelbrooke
Katherine Fletcher Portrait Katherine Fletcher (South Ribble) (Con)
- Hansard - -

My right hon. Friend is making a powerful case around what many of us hear on the doorstep. Does he agree that being able to define exactly what any levy would be for is a really important part of explaining something when people are fearful of their energy bills? Some have concerns about the hydrogen levy: “What hydrogen is it? Is it green hydrogen produced by wind? Is it blue hydrogen produced from carbon fossil-fuel sources with associated carbon capture and storage?” Blue hydrogen still contains some contaminants. Does he believe that “hydrogen” has been defined enough to allow us to explain things to the general public?

Alec Shelbrooke Portrait Alec Shelbrooke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend touches on an important point, drawing on comments made by the shadow Minister, the hon. Member for Southampton, Test. We are being asked to add a levy before we know how it will be used or what type of hydrogen it will generate. I do not think that people like signing open cheques without the way forward being defined.

I want to develop the argument for why hydrogen is an important step and to look at its applications in the automotive industry. The reason I say that is purely—