Jarrow Crusade

Kate Osborne Excerpts

Thursday 22nd October 2026 Westminster Hall

[Kate Osborne (Jarrow and Gateshead East) (Lab)]

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the legacy of the Jarrow Crusade on the 90th anniversary.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mrs Hobhouse. The Jarrow crusade is now rightly remembered as a pivotal moment in UK history, not just in my brilliant constituency of Jarrow and Gateshead East but across the UK. Jarrow is a town with a proud history of people organising together to stand up to injustice and demand something better—one that refuses to accept that poverty, exploitation and inequality are simply the natural order of things.

On 5 October 1936, 200 unemployed men left Jarrow to begin a near-300-mile journey to London. Their petition represented the hopes of a community devastated by industrial decline and mass unemployment. They demonstrated the strength, solidarity and determination of the people of Jarrow. Ninety years later, their story is still relevant and needs to be heard.

Standing with the marchers’ descendants in front of No. 10 this week, with the original petition box that they carried all that way, was extremely moving. The Prime Minister bringing the descendants into No. 10 for a cup of tea and a discussion, and listening to their memories and our history, helped to right the historic wrong by giving the families the welcome that the marchers should have received back in 1936. I place on record my thanks to the Prime Minister and his team for the time they spent with us all and for helping to host the events this month. Listening to memories and stories of those crusaders from their children has been moving and inspiring.

It is a real honour to lead this debate today. Our history must be remembered and celebrated for the benefit of a new generation, but it must also be used to move forward, to learn from and to build a better world, because while some progress has been made, there is still a lot to do. Those marchers in 1936 were demanding the right to work, the dignity of providing for their families and the opportunity to build a future for their community. They were fighting against health inequality, poverty and a lack of housing. Ninety years later, many of those challenges remain.

In my constituency, 39% of children still live in food poverty, too many people are still in insecure work, and the north-east is still being left behind. Across South Tyneside, the number of people aged 18 to 21 claiming unemployment benefits is 61% higher than the national average. Local weekly earnings remain below the national average. Almost a century on from the march, generations are still growing up in and around Jarrow unable to find suitable work and with high levels of inequality and poverty.

Since becoming Jarrow’s MP in 2019, I have had to confront what those circumstances mean for the people I represent. We know all too well the lasting consequences that the loss of industry can have on a community. After the closure of the shipyards, skilled workers were left without jobs, families faced poverty and uncertainty, and the businesses and communities that depended on the shipyards suffered too. The loss of industry was not confined to the factory gates; it reached into people’s homes, affected children’s prospects, undermined the confidence of an entire town and shifted our identity. We see similar challenges playing out now. These commemorative events and today’s debate are about remembering those who bravely marched to demand better, but they are also about looking to the future and embracing the potential of the north-east, because the challenges that faced working-class communities then continue to face them.

We must appreciate the progress we have made and recognise what remains to be done. Thanks to this Labour Government, good steps have already been taken to deliver for our community, and I welcome them. Our landmark Employment Rights Act 2025 means that workers can feel more secure, valued and stable, with stronger rights to dignified, unionised work that pays well. Access to decent work that pays fairly and provides security is intrinsic to ensuring that no community like ours is left behind.

Similarly, thanks to the Pride in Place programme, I have secured £20 million for our community. Priorities for the investment include creating opportunities for young people, rebuilding our town centre and strengthening community organisations. Strengthening community organisations matters, because investment alone does not change communities; giving communities a voice in what that change looks like does.

For too many families in Jarrow, being in work does not provide the financial security that they deserve. Parents are working hard, but their wages are still insufficient to provide the opportunities that they want for their children. Too many young people are struggling to find secure, well-paid employment that would allow them to build a future in the communities where they grew up. Those are the same fundamental challenges that the Jarrow crusaders marched to confront 90 years ago, and they are why we cannot afford to be complacent about the progress we have made.

Although we can and should celebrate the progress that the Government have made, and the welcome new steps of our Prime Minister, it is clear that we still need more investment in the north-east to create well-paid and secure jobs and to give local people more of a say in decisions that affect their lives. That includes bringing shipbuilding back to the Tyne, with more jobs, more apprenticeships and more investment. We must build on the industrial heritage of the north-east, which has a history of skilled, hard-working people that continues to define my constituency to this day and will do so long into the future.

I put it on the record how pleased I was to hear the Chancellor mention Jarrow and the crusade in one of his speeches, and how pleased I am that he met apprentices from Balaena. Will the Minister commit to pushing for more shipbuilding and other investment in the north-east and to tackling youth unemployment and poverty with good, highly skilled, well-paid jobs and education opportunities for our communities? I also ask him what further steps the Government are taking to ensure that communities such as Jarrow are at the heart of plans for industrial growth and that the jobs and opportunities created by that investment benefit local people. As we mark 90 years since the Jarrow crusade, will he join me in recognising not only the extraordinary determination of those who marched then, but the importance of continuing the fight for decent jobs, dignity at work and opportunities for working-class communities today?

It has been wonderful to bring the hope that the Prime Minister has been speaking about back to the north, particularly the north-east, and to share our history with a new generation. The greatest lesson of the Jarrow crusade is what ordinary people can achieve when they organise, work together and stand up for one another. By the centenary in 2036, I want us to be able to celebrate real progress in tackling poverty and creating opportunities for every child in Jarrow, and I hope the Minister joins me in that commitment.

--- Later in debate ---

[Kate Osborne]

I thank the Minister for his detailed response; it will mean a lot to the descendants of the marchers and members of our community who may be watching this debate. I also thank the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon) for his engagement and support, and all those who came along to my exhibition on the Jarrow crusade earlier this week.

As I leave this debate, I reflect on the legacy left behind by the brave men who marched for better. To the descendants of those who marched, to those watching at home and to the people of Jarrow, this debate belongs to you. Your voices matter today as much as those voices did in 1936. The greatest tribute we can pay to the Jarrow crusaders is not simply commemorating their march, but continuing their fight for decent work, dignity, solidarity and a fairer future, for our community and every community.

Question put and agreed to.

Resolved,

That this House has considered the legacy of the Jarrow Crusade on the 90th anniversary.

Health Bill

Kate Osborne Excerpts

Report stage & 3rd reading
Tuesday 8th September 2026 Commons Chamber

[Madam Deputy Speaker]

Order. I call Kate Osborne.

[Kate Osborne (Jarrow and Gateshead East) (Lab)]

If I may begin on a personal note, just three weeks ago I had a second operation on my back, and I wish to put on record my sincere thanks to the staff who cared for me, from the clinicians who treated me to everyone involved in my care and recovery. [Hon. Members: “Hear, hear.]

Too often our access to healthcare depends on our postcode. That postcode lottery is stark in a number of areas, but nowhere more so than with IVF. As chair of the APPG on fertility, I have raised this issue repeatedly with Ministers. I again invite Ministers to attend our fertility roundtable tomorrow and to commit to ensuring that every ICB follows, at the very least, the NICE guidelines on access to IVF and fertility treatment.

We must strengthen the role of voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations in neighbourhood health planning and NHS commissioning. Voluntary organisations understand the barriers to care for hard-to-reach communities and often have trusted relationships with communities that statutory services struggle to reach. We see that particularly clearly in HIV and AIDS provision. Voluntary organisations have been fundamental to the UK’s response for decades, through prevention, testing, peer support, tackling stigma and supporting people living with HIV. I am extremely grateful to the National AIDS Trust for working with me on the new clauses, and I thank Ministers for their constructive engagement. Members of the LGBT+ community must have trust in healthcare providers, and community groups bridge that gap when needed.

New clauses 142 and 143 would actively harm vitally needed healthcare. The provision in new clause 142 has already been rejected in Committee, and we see it for what it is: an opportunity to attack some of the most vulnerable in our society. Access to much-needed healthcare has already been paused in the UK, and if access to treatment for gender dysphoria is now to be dependent upon additional research, the pathways trial must go ahead without further delay.

The provisions in new clause 143 were also rejected in Committee and are another attempt to vilify. The amendment fails to recognise the framework already in place to ensure that single-sex services are provided where they meet the requirements of the Equality Act. Neither the code nor the Supreme Court judgment mandate the provision of single-sex facilities. Providers must still consider whether the service falls within an exception within the Equality Act, whether single-sex provision is proportionate, what the impact might be on trans people, and what mitigation might be necessary.

I welcome the 10-year health plan. We have made great strides in repairing the damage done to our NHS—

[Madam Deputy Speaker (Caroline Nokes)]

Order. I call Sir Bernard Jenkin.

Puberty-suppressing Hormones

Kate Osborne Excerpts

Wednesday 11th December 2024 Commons Chamber

[Wes Streeting]

It is important, particularly with this group of children and young people, that clinicians ask a range of questions to identify the nature of a child’s needs, and respond appropriately by providing holistic and evidence-based healthcare. That is the best way of turning around the horrendous statistics on the effects of gender dysphoria on children and young people, and it is how we will achieve better, healthier and happier outcomes for that cohort of patients.

[Kate Osborne (Jarrow and Gateshead East) (Lab)]

I wrote to the Secretary of State this morning, before his statement was announced, to highlight that a Council of Europe report notes that gender-affirming hormone therapy for trans minors in the UK is almost impossible to access, and that the total withdrawal of access to healthcare outside of a research trial may breach the

“fundamental ethical principles governing research”.

The restrictions on puberty blockers remove the clinical expertise from medical decision making, which significantly impacts on young trans people and their families, and I am hugely disappointed by the content of the statement. Will he read that Council of Europe report, and will he agree to meet me, as a UK delegate, to discuss it?

[Wes Streeting]

I am certainly happy to continue meeting my hon. Friend on this issue. With great respect to the Council of Europe and the authors of the report that she mentions, I have to take decisions about the welfare, wellbeing and safety of children in this country based on clinical evidence. When our own Commission on Human Medicines says that there is an “unacceptable safety risk” and an unsafe prescribing environment, I have to take that seriously. When one of our country’s leading paediatricians says that there is insufficient evidence about the long-term effects of the use of this particular drug for this particular purpose for this particular cohort of children and young people, I have to take that seriously.

I know there are people who will be deeply disappointed by this decision, including many trans people and their families. Thinking about some of the young people I have met in recent weeks and months, I have taken to heart what they have said, and I know this will be deeply upsetting to them. I do not take that lightly, but to anyone challenging me to do something else, I ask them quite sincerely whether if they were standing in my shoes as the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, looking at recommendations from clinicians in our country—including the Commission on Human Medicines—saying that there is insufficient evidence for the use of medication in children and young people for this purpose and an unacceptable safety risk arising from the current prescribing environment, they would really take a different position.

Income Tax (Charge)

Kate Osborne Excerpts

Tuesday 5th November 2024 Commons Chamber

[Kate Osborne (Jarrow and Gateshead East) (Lab)]

I congratulate all hon. Members making their maiden speeches today, especially my regional colleague, my hon. Friend the Member for Sunderland Central (Lewis Atkinson).

I am proud that, while making history as the first ever woman to deliver a Budget, our Chancellor honoured a true hero of my constituency: Jarrow’s “Red Ellen” Wilkinson. Ellen was a remarkable politician and trailblazer for women everywhere. It is about time that we had some recognition of women in this place, and I am pleased that the Chancellor has made a start on the artwork, with the fabulous picture of Ellen on the wall in 11 Downing Street. We need many more pictures of women trailblazers across Parliament.

The Budget shows that we are a Government who will work for the people. There is a lot to celebrate, including the largest ever increase in carer’s allowance, closing inheritance tax loopholes, additional funding for further education, increasing the national minimum wage, investing in breakfast clubs, record investment in the NHS, ensuring that former mineworkers get the money that was kept from their pensions, which is hugely important to my constituents, and setting aside funding for the contaminated blood scandal, as well as for the victims of the Horizon scandal, for which I have long campaigned with my constituent Chris Head.

I will continue to push for people to be held to account for their role in the Horizon scandal, and for a speedy resolution so that outstanding claims are paid in full. Nothing should stand in the way of victims finally getting justice. They should not have been left waiting decades by the Conservatives. Someone might think from the contributions of Conservative Members that the last 14 years had never happened, but our public services are at the point of collapse, no youth centres are left, school buildings are crumbling, the NHS is in crisis and the economy was crashed because of the Conservatives’ gross incompetence and deliberate mismanagement, as they put their cronies over the people of this country. Finally, we can move on from 14 years of Conservative destruction of our communities. In this Budget, the poorest households gain the most and the wealthiest pay the most. That shows the difference that a Labour Government can and will make.

Of course, I wish we could have done much more. I wish the Budget had been able to lift the two-child benefit cap. I wish we had been able to right the injustice for women from the Women Against State Pension Inequality Campaign. I wish we could have increased the pension credit threshold. I wish we could have invested more in our local authorities. However, let us be very clear: the fact that we cannot do any of that is entirely down to the Conservative party.

As chair of the north-east all-party parliamentary group, I know that transport is one of our most important challenges, alongside employment opportunities and investment. Although I will celebrate the clear wins, I will continue to work with Government Front Benchers to ask for more investment to improve the lives of people in the north-east, particularly my Jarrow and Gateshead East constituents.