Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Julie Hilling

Main Page: Julie Hilling (Labour - Bolton West)

Oral Answers to Questions

Julie Hilling Excerpts
Thursday 6th June 2013

(11 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am very happy to scotch the hon. Gentleman’s baseless scaremongering and political point-scoring. The fact of the matter is that we are going forward with the CCS programme, and it is going to be successful, unlike Labour’s failed attempts at CCS. We have two preferred bidders in place, and it is backed by £1 billion, putting the UK at the front of the global race for carbon capture and storage.

Julie Hilling Portrait Julie Hilling (Bolton West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

8. What recent assessment he has made of the likely level of future fuel poverty in the UK.

Mark Lazarowicz Portrait Mark Lazarowicz (Edinburgh North and Leith) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

9. Whether he plans to take further steps to reduce the level of fuel poverty in the UK.

--- Later in debate ---
Ed Davey Portrait The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Mr Edward Davey)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Recently published statistics show a modest fall in fuel poverty in 2011 compared with 2010, from 4.75 million UK households to 4.5 million UK households. This is welcome, but we are determined to do more. Our comprehensive policy package includes targeted energy efficiency measures under the green deal and the energy company obligation, direct bill rebates under the warm home discount and, of course, measures through the Energy Bill to back Ofgem’s proposals to simplify the market.

Julie Hilling Portrait Julie Hilling
- Hansard - -

Under the previous Labour Government, the number of people in fuel poverty fell by 1.75 million. In the past two years, the number of households in fuel poverty has gone up from one in five to one in four. When next year’s figures come out, will the number of people in fuel poverty be higher or lower than when Labour left office?

Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Lady will know that during the previous Parliament, when Labour was in office, fuel poverty grew in every single year and that, according to the latest figures, it has now gone down. In many ways this is a rather odd debate. The Government commissioned Professor Hills to review how we measure fuel poverty and he has come up with proposals that have gained wide-scale acceptance. We have consulted on them and will respond shortly to that consultation. We believe that the old measurements of fuel poverty, which are still in use, need radical reform so that we can better target fuel poverty policy.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It has been much more challenging than we anticipated, not least because when we entered government we found that the previous Government had done absolutely no work on this whatsoever. This is the first renewable heat scheme of its type in the world, and heat is much more difficult to quantify and value than exporting electricity, but it is good news. We prioritised industrial heat and are now moving on to domestic heat, and I am looking forward to the scheme’s launch this spring.

Julie Hilling Portrait Julie Hilling (Bolton West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The Minister claims that the energy company obligation will help people in fuel poverty, but is it not true that nearly 60% of the funding will go to households that can already afford to pay, not to those people in fuel poverty?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is anticipated that more than £500 million of the ECO funding will go directly to the most vulnerable and those who need it most, but the balance of the energy company obligation is intended to support roll-outs street by street. It was the specific nature of previous Government schemes under Labour that made them so bureaucratic and ineffective. Our view is that we ultimately need to focus on properties, not just the individuals who live in them.