Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Julia Lopez and Nicholas Dakin
Tuesday 22nd April 2025

(5 days, 3 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Nicholas Dakin Portrait Sir Nicholas Dakin
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend asks a serious and difficult question. The Mental Health Bill, introduced to Parliament last November, aims to stop restricted patients from languishing in hospital unnecessarily, while prioritising public protection and managing any risks. The Department also works closely with clinicians and care teams to make decisions on restricted patients as quickly as possible, in line with the published guidelines.

Julia Lopez Portrait Julia Lopez (Hornchurch and Upminster) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

T5. Release on temporary licence is denied when people say nasty stuff on Twitter but granted for much more serious crimes. Can the Secretary of State tell me when I can expect a satisfactory reply to an urgent ROTL case that I have already raised with the Prisons Minister and senior civil servants and that affects a grieving family in my constituency?

Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill (Second sitting)

Debate between Julia Lopez and Nicholas Dakin
Nicholas Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Q But “in the sight of” is different from “in the hearing of”.

Peter Carter: “In the hearing of” means that private, privileged communication is effectively frustrated, and that is very worrying.

Julia Lopez Portrait Julia Lopez (Hornchurch and Upminster) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Q I wanted to raise this when we were debating the three clicks issue, but it seems to me that there are parallels between viewing terror material and viewing child pornography content. I am keen to understand your positions on the issue of establishing a pattern of behaviour and when is an appropriate time to prosecute somebody for viewing material.

Does Liberty believe that you should never be prosecuted simply for viewing material? Or are you arguing that, in the case of terror, viewing the material is not sufficiently serious, in comparison with something such as child pornography, that you should be able to convict somebody for it?

Corey Stoughton: Child pornography is a different case, because it is inherently criminal. The harm is done in the viewing and in the production of those—