(12 years, 9 months ago)
Commons ChamberMy hon. Friend has been running a great campaign on this issue, alongside many other honourable colleagues. As she says, support has been demonstrated by a lot of the other stakeholders and, of course, by the Derby Telegraph, fine institution that it is. We are confident that we have the information we need, working with Network Rail, and we will be looking further at that in the run-up to these decisions. Of course we take this issue very seriously, because we are committed to electrification of the rail network; we are committed to about 800 miles of it, with about 130 miles of it on stream with TransPennine electrification, whereas the Labour Government only managed less than 10 miles of it.
May I tell the Minister that this project also has huge support from the fine institution that is the Leicester Mercury? She has referred to the strength of feeling expressed in Monday evening’s debate. This project has huge cross-party support and support in the business community, although there is concern in some quarters that, because of HS2, we will not get the money for it. Given that the population and the conurbations that this line serves are likely to expand greatly over the next few years, the sooner she can give us a firm commitment on this, the better.
I am delighted that the Leicester Mercury is also on side, too. As the Secretary of State has made clear, we believe that it is important to invest in and upgrade our current rail network, as well as prepare for the challenges of the future with HS2. But it is only because this Government have made a decision to prioritise investment in transport, despite the deficit that we inherited from our predecessors, that we are having this conversation at all and it is the only reason that electrification of the midland main line is a real possibility.
(12 years, 11 months ago)
Commons ChamberI know that my hon. Friend is a strong campaigner for improvements to the rail lines that serve her constituency. This is something that we are looking at carefully. We have asked Network Rail to do important work on deciding how we might improve the frequency of the services in the way that she wishes to see, and whether the infrastructure needed to deliver that is within the budgets that have already been allocated to Network Rail. We will also look at what we might be able to do in the next control period, as part of our high-level output specification—HLOS—statement, which we will publish in the summer.
Will the Minister update the House on the Department’s attitude the electrification of the midland main line? There is widespread concern that, because of HS2 and other pressures, the electrification will not go ahead for quite some time. It would, however, provide a huge boost to the east midlands economy and to cities such as Leicester.
Leicester and the communities around it have been running a very good campaign on this issue. The Government have made it clear that we see the progressive electrification of the rail network as an important part of our transport and environmental policy. The electrification of the midland main line has been prioritised by the industry in its initial industry plan, which will form an important part of the decisions that we have to make on what will be funded in the next railway control period. We will give further details in our HLOS statement in July.
(13 years ago)
Ministerial CorrectionsTo ask the Secretary of State for Transport which consultants and advisers her Department has employed in respect of the (a) Thameslink programme, (b) Thameslink rolling stock procurement and (c) Intercity Express programme; how much she has budgeted in respect of each such contractor; and how much each contractor has invoiced to date.
[Official Report, 23 November 2011, Vol. 536, c. 411-12W.]
Letter of correction from Mrs Theresa Villiers:
An error has been identified in the written answer given to the hon. Member for Leicester South (Jonathan Ashworth) on 23 November 2011. The full answer given was as follows:
[holding answer 21 October 2011]: The information requested can be found as follows.
£ million | |||
---|---|---|---|
Costs incurred to May 2010 | Cost incurred June 2010 to September 2011 | October 2011 to March 2012 forecast | |
Arup | 4.0 | 1.7 | 0.5 |
Freshfields | 6.6 | 1.9 | 1.3 |
PWC | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 |
Interfleet | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0 |
Booz | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
Total | 15.1 | 4.9 | 2.5 |
£ million | |||
---|---|---|---|
Costs incurred to May 2010 | Cost incurred June 2010 to September 2011 | October 2011 to March 2012 forecast | |
Atkins | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
EC Harris | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.25 |
SDG | 0 | 0.1 | 0.03 |
Nichols | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.04 |
Bovis Lend Lease Consulting | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.09 |
Eversheds | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0 |
Willis | 0.036 | 0.004 | 0.01 |
Total | 2.906 | 1.014 | 0.52 |
£ million | |||
---|---|---|---|
Costs incurred to May 2010 | Cost incurred June 2010 to September 2011 | October 2011 to March 2012 forecast | |
Barkers HR Advertising | 0.016 | 0 | 0 |
Capita Resourcing | 0.3 | 0.008 | 0 |
Clifford Chance | 0.002 | 0 | 0 |
Congress Centre | 0.012 | 0 | 0 |
Ernst and Young | 0.2 | 0 | 0 |
First Class Partnership | 0.006 | 0 | 0 |
Freshfields | 5.6 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Jim Standen Associates | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
Manpower | 0 | 0.13 | 0.25 |
Mott MacDonald | 11.8 | 0.48 | 0.70 |
MWB Business Exchange | 0.002 | 0 | 0 |
Nichols | 3.1 | 0.09 | 0.02 |
PWC | 2.5 | 0.16 | 0.8 |
QCs | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Reed Employment | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0 |
SDG | 1.2 | 0.13 | 0 |
Willis | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.009 |
Total | 24.81 | 2.04 | 2.88 |