Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

John Howell

Main Page: John Howell (Conservative - Henley)

Oral Answers to Questions

John Howell Excerpts
Thursday 10th June 2010

(13 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Chris Kelly Portrait Chris Kelly (Dudley South) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

4. What steps he plans to take to end regional spatial strategies.

John Howell Portrait John Howell (Henley) (Con)
- Hansard - -

10. What steps he plans to take to end regional spatial strategies.

Greg Clark Portrait The Minister of State, Department for Communities and Local Government (Greg Clark)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We committed in the Queen's Speech to abolishing regional strategies. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has written to all council leaders saying that he expects them to have regard to that as a material planning consideration in any decisions they are currently taking.

Greg Clark Portrait Greg Clark
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful for my hon. Friend’s welcome, and I welcome him to the House. I know that he has always been a vigorous local campaigner.

The point behind abolishing the regional spatial strategies is that we believe that local communities should make decisions locally and should have the ability to put them into effect. It is, of course, important to make provision for Travellers, but such decisions should be taken locally.

John Howell Portrait John Howell
- Hansard - -

I welcome the Minister to his post. Will he confirm that, as I set out in our radical planning paper “Open Source Planning”, the expectation is that abolishing regional spatial strategies will reinvigorate our planning system and move us away from the historically low level of house building that we have seen, which has so badly failed us?

Greg Clark Portrait Greg Clark
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. I half expected to find a note on my desk from the previous Housing Minister apologising for the fact that there were no houses, but he did not get round to writing it.

I am glad that my hon. Friend draws attention to his role in what I think will be an important paper. He wrote in that paper that the present system

“imposes too many one-size-fits-all rules…Tragically, the very idea that development can benefit a community has…become a casualty.”

That is the reality of the system that we have been labouring under—literally “Labouring” under. The system does not work in practice or in theory; what kind of bankrupt system is that?