Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Oral Answers to Questions

John Glen Excerpts
Wednesday 10th July 2013

(11 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
The Prime Minister was asked—
John Glen Portrait John Glen (Salisbury) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Q1. If he will list his official engagements for Wednesday 10 July.

Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton Portrait The Prime Minister (Mr David Cameron)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Before listing my engagements, I am sure the whole House, and indeed the whole country, will wish to join me in congratulating Andy Murray on his historic Wimbledon success. To become the first British player to win Wimbledon for 77 years is a fantastic achievement and will rightly go down in our history books.

This morning, I had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, and in addition to my duties in the House, I shall have further such meetings later today.

John Glen Portrait John Glen
- Hansard - -

Today, the Government are setting out plans to modernise Royal Mail and to allow hard-working—[Interruption.]

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. This is exceptionally discourteous. We have Question 1. The hon. Gentleman will ask the question; and that question, and the answer to it, will be heard.

John Glen Portrait John Glen
- Hansard - -

Today, the Government are setting out plans to modernise Royal Mail and to allow hard-working postmen and women to own 10% of the shares. Will the Prime Minister tell us what support he is expecting to see for this measure?

Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton Portrait The Prime Minister
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank my hon. Friend for his question. I think there will be widespread support around the country for modernising this great public service, for getting new capital into the service and for ensuring that 10% of the shares go to the people who work for Royal Mail. Remarkably, it was proposed by the Labour party when it was in government, but of course, because the trade unions now oppose it, Labour has to oppose it too—fresh evidence today that it is still in the pockets of its trade union paymasters.