All 1 Debates between Joan Ruddock and Tobias Ellwood

Energy Efficiency

Debate between Joan Ruddock and Tobias Ellwood
Wednesday 30th June 2010

(14 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Tobias Ellwood Portrait Mr Ellwood
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is all the more reason to make passionate speeches to ensure that everyone in Britain understands and grasps the importance of harnessing this free energy.

I was saddened to see the outcome of the Amsterdam talks on climate change. I hoped that with the election of President Obama, the United States would show more involved leadership in this area. I certainly hope that in November in Cancun we will see a more convincing legal binding agreement, which will encourage countries to take climate change more seriously.

The issue of supply and storage came up when we debated carbon capture and storage during our consideration of the Energy Act 2010, on which the right hon. Member for Lewisham, Deptford (Joan Ruddock) was the lead Minister. I was concerned last winter, as many in Britain were, at how close the lights came to going out. We must never again reach the position where we could run out of energy in a matter of days.

Joan Ruddock Portrait Joan Ruddock
- Hansard - -

indicated dissent.

Tobias Ellwood Portrait Mr Ellwood
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I knew that that would provoke a response from the hon. Lady. We had about six days’ supply left, and if the supply chain had failed, lights would have gone out. Instructions had gone out to businesses to alert them to the fact that their contract meant that their energy supply would be cut.

Joan Ruddock Portrait Joan Ruddock
- Hansard - -

rose—

Tobias Ellwood Portrait Mr Ellwood
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thought that that would prompt a reaction.

Joan Ruddock Portrait Joan Ruddock
- Hansard - -

I am sorry that the hon. Gentleman has had to provoke me. The fact is that the companies that were given the notices had entered into interruptible contracts, for which the price is lower because they are asked at times to lower their consumption of electricity. That is a reasonable thing to do. They chose to have the contracts. No one forced those contracts on them, and at no time were we in danger of the lights going out.