To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Passports
Thursday 26th March 2015

Asked by: Jim Murphy (Labour - East Renfrewshire)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what her Department's policy is on (a) the issue of passports and (b) legal recognition for those who do not associate with a particular gender; and if she will make a statement.

Answered by James Brokenshire

We understand the concerns of those people who do not associate with a particular gender. UK law recognises only male and female gender and to introduce a third category denoted by an ‘X’ would require a change in primary legislation. We would not envisage the passport being changed in isolation without legislative change, as there would be an impact on other areas such as sex discrimination, nationality, adoption, human embryology, immigration, and gender recognition. Such a change would need to be on the basis that it was required by law, that it provided additional benefits to the applicant, and that the high standards of public and personal safety achieved by the UK passport were not diluted. We continue to monitor the situation and work with colleagues and interested parties in the UK and internationally. However, there are no current plans to change domestic legislation to add to or remove the male and female gender, or to make this change to the passport process


Written Question
Jobseeker's Allowance
Thursday 26th March 2015

Asked by: Jim Murphy (Labour - East Renfrewshire)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what conditions are placed on jobseeker's allowance claimants who are in receipt of new enterprise grants.

Answered by Esther McVey

A person in receipt of a New Enterprise Allowance weekly allowance is no longer registered as unemployed. However, as a condition of receiving the allowance the recipient is required at the 6, 12 and 19 week stage to provide evidence of trading. If they are unable to do this the allowance may be withdrawn.


Written Question
Jobseeker's Allowance
Thursday 26th March 2015

Asked by: Jim Murphy (Labour - East Renfrewshire)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what support is provided to people on jobseeker's allowance who are setting up their own businesses.

Answered by Esther McVey

New Enterprise Allowance (NEA) is the main support provided by DWP to those who are setting up their own business. The scheme has successfully helped set up over 65,000 new businesses.

A participant accepted onto the scheme will receive support from a business mentor to help develop their ideas and through the early stages of trading. If their business plan is approved they may receive a weekly allowance over 26 weeks worth up to £1,274.

Participants may also apply for an unsecured loan through the Start-up loan scheme if they need start-up capital.


Division Vote (Commons)
25 Mar 2015 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Jim Murphy (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 214 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 226
Division Vote (Commons)
25 Mar 2015 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Jim Murphy (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 217 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 305
Division Vote (Commons)
25 Mar 2015 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Jim Murphy (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 217 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 229 Noes - 306
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Mar 2015 - Section 5 of the European Communities (Amendment) Act 1993 - View Vote Context
Jim Murphy (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 188 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 199
Written Question
Living Wage
Tuesday 24th March 2015

Asked by: Jim Murphy (Labour - East Renfrewshire)

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 15 December 2014 to the hon. Member for Washington and Sunderland West to Question 217417, how many of the 215 people paid less than the living wage employed on two major contracts reside in Scotland.

Answered by Dan Rogerson

None.


MP Expense Claim
Jim Murphy (Labour - East Renfrewshire)
Date
Tue 24th Mar 2015
430674
Type
MP Travel
(Public Tr UND)
Description
underground top up
travel
Between London & Constituency
From: Glasgow
To: London
Amount
£50.00
Paid

Division Vote (Commons)
23 Mar 2015 - Amendment of the Law - View Vote Context
Jim Murphy (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 337 Noes - 240