All 2 Debates between Jane Ellison and David Gauke

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Jane Ellison and David Gauke
Tuesday 12th March 2013

(11 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jane Ellison Portrait Jane Ellison (Battersea) (Con)
- Hansard - -

15. What steps he is taking to improve international co-operation to tackle tax avoidance. [R]

David Gauke Portrait The Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury (Mr David Gauke)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government are determined to ensure that multinational companies pay their fair share of tax. The UK is committed to taking multilateral action through the G20 and the OECD to tackle the issues of profit-shifting by multinationals and erosion of the corporate tax base. The OECD presented its initial report on addressing these issues at the G20 meeting in Moscow last month and will present a comprehensive action plan to tackle them at the G20 in July this year.

--- Later in debate ---
David Gauke Portrait Mr Gauke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The point I would make is that we want to have an international tax system under which economic activity is taxed where that economic activity takes place. The fact is that the international rules have not moved with the times, but they need to do so, and I am delighted that the Chancellor of the Exchequer is leading the way in this debate.

Jane Ellison Portrait Jane Ellison
- Hansard - -

Many of my constituents—particularly younger constituents and Church groups—are very interested in this agenda and are closely following what the Government are hoping to achieve this year. Is the Minister optimistic that our international partners will respond positively to this agenda and we can make progress on it?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Jane Ellison and David Gauke
Tuesday 24th April 2012

(12 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Gauke Portrait Mr Gauke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is worth pointing out that this £3 billion figure that the shadow Chancellor and others recite suggests an entirely static process. Nobody believes that a 50p rate has no behavioural impact whatever, but that is the Labour party’s ridiculous position. That was not its position when in government, and it is not a position that any credible economist would support.

Jane Ellison Portrait Jane Ellison (Battersea) (Con)
- Hansard - -

T1. If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.