To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Job Support Scheme
Wednesday 4th November 2020

Asked by: Jamie Stone (Liberal Democrat - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether employers who submitted an annual Full Payment Submission between 6 April 2019 up to 11:59 pm 23 September 2020 are eligible for the Job Support Scheme; and for what reason the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme does not allow employers to claim from 6 April 2019.

Answered by Jesse Norman - Shadow Leader of the House of Commons

On 31 October 2020 the Prime Minister announced that the Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) was being extended, with employees receiving 80% of their current salary for hours not worked, up to a maximum of £2,500.

On 29 May 2020 the Government announced that employers would be able to use the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme to furlough employees flexibly from 1 July 2020. In order to enable the introduction of flexible furloughing, it was necessary to close the old scheme. As part of the 29 May announcement, the Government made clear that employers would have until 31 July 2020 to submit claims which covered periods running up to 30 June 2020.


Written Question
Banks and Post Offices: Closures
Monday 12th October 2020

Asked by: Jamie Stone (Liberal Democrat - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what representations he has received from residents in (a) Wick and (b) other towns in cases where a bank branch has been proposed for closure at the same time as the proposed closure of the last post office in that area; and if he will make a statement.

Answered by John Glen

Though I understand the disappointment felt in a community when a bank branch closes, these are ultimately commercial decisions in which the government does not seek to intervene.

We know that the retail financial landscape is changing, as more consumers and businesses opt for the convenience, security, and speed of digital payments and digital banking. Banking service providers need to balance customer interests, market competition, and other commercial factors when considering their strategy.

However, the government also firmly believes that the impact of branch closures should be understood, considered, and mitigated where possible so that all customers, wherever they live, continue to have access to over-the-counter banking services if they wish to use them. That is why the government supports the industry’s Access to Banking Standard which helps customers to understand the options they have locally to continue to access banking services, including specialist assistance for customers who need more help.

Alternative options include the Post Office, which allows 95% of business and 99% of personal banking customers to carry out their everyday banking at 11,500 Post Office branches across the UK. Over 90% of the national population live within one mile of their nearest post office branch, and over 99% within three miles. Almost 99% of the rural population also lives within 3 miles of their nearest post office branch. While there is no programme of post office closures, some unexpected closures can occur, often for reasons beyond the control of the Post Office. When this happens, the Post Office works hard to find alternative service providers so that services can be restored.

In September 2020, the FCA published guidance setting out their expectation of firms when they are deciding whether and how to reduce their physical branches or the number of free to use ATMs. Firms are expected to carefully consider the impact of a planned closure on their customers’ everyday banking and cash access needs, and other relevant branch services and consider possible alternative access arrangements. This will ensure the implementation of closure decisions is done in a way that treats customers fairly.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 09 Sep 2020
Protection of Jobs and Businesses

"Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?..."
Jamie Stone - View Speech

View all Jamie Stone (LD - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) contributions to the debate on: Protection of Jobs and Businesses

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 09 Sep 2020
Protection of Jobs and Businesses

"The Chief Secretary is very gracious for giving way. This is possibly not the intervention he expects. When we get through all this, and when we have time and peace and quiet, may I urge him and the Chancellor to carry out some sort of audit of how the furlough …..."
Jamie Stone - View Speech

View all Jamie Stone (LD - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) contributions to the debate on: Protection of Jobs and Businesses

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 09 Sep 2020
Protection of Jobs and Businesses

"I give credit where it is due to the Government: the assistance afforded to the tourism industry has saved it in my constituency, which relies hugely on tourism. God forbid that the second spike gets worse than it is, but if it does and we have to close things down …..."
Jamie Stone - View Speech

View all Jamie Stone (LD - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) contributions to the debate on: Protection of Jobs and Businesses

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 09 Sep 2020
Protection of Jobs and Businesses

"Will the hon. Gentleman give way?..."
Jamie Stone - View Speech

View all Jamie Stone (LD - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) contributions to the debate on: Protection of Jobs and Businesses

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 09 Sep 2020
Protection of Jobs and Businesses

"The hon. Member is very courteous to give way. I too pay tribute to the furlough scheme, which has been very helpful to businesses in my constituency. I am the chair of the Excluded UK all-party parliamentary group. Other Members have made this point already, but does he agree that …..."
Jamie Stone - View Speech

View all Jamie Stone (LD - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) contributions to the debate on: Protection of Jobs and Businesses

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 15 Jul 2020
Covid-19: Future UK-EU Relationship

"I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving way in his characteristically kindly manner. Perhaps I can take him back to the thrust of his speech. Is it not very regrettable that we still do not seem to have any details that lead us to believe anything very much about what …..."
Jamie Stone - View Speech

View all Jamie Stone (LD - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) contributions to the debate on: Covid-19: Future UK-EU Relationship

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 15 Jul 2020
Covid-19: Future UK-EU Relationship

"In thinking of certainties in this debate, I trust that the hon. Member shares with me a great gratitude to the armed forces. Regardless of whether they are Welsh, Scottish, English or Irish, they cross borders into Wales and Scotland to come and help to defeat the virus. I think …..."
Jamie Stone - View Speech

View all Jamie Stone (LD - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) contributions to the debate on: Covid-19: Future UK-EU Relationship

Written Question
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
Monday 6th July 2020

Asked by: Jamie Stone (Liberal Democrat - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the number of companies that were not eligible for the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme as a result of filing their annual PAYE report after the 19 March 2020.

Answered by Jesse Norman - Shadow Leader of the House of Commons

It is not possible to provide an answer in the time available.