Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between James Davies and Andrew Selous

Wednesday 5th July 2023 Commons Chamber

[Dr Davies]

The hon. Member is right to reference investment in rail in north Wales. Growth Track 360 has pressed for that hard—I have been involved with that, as he has—and the North Wales Transport Commission has recently outlined similar projects. He will be aware of the Union connectivity review development funding pot that has been available, and the entry in RNEP for the north Wales coast main line in relation to line speeds.

[Andrew Selous (South West Bedfordshire) (Con)]

9. What steps he is taking to increase levels of investment in Wales.

[The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Wales (Dr James Davies)]

Foreign investment created 3,062 jobs over the last year. With the number of FDI projects also on the rise, that shows that more and more investors are looking to Wales. This is testament to the £52 million that we are providing to support two new freeports, our commitment to delivering at least one investment zone in Wales, and the £1 billion we are investing in the next decade to boost the UK’s global strengths in semiconductors.

[Andrew Selous]

Does the Minister agree that supply chain businesses need

“a modern, functioning road network to keep goods moving efficiently”—

whether they are on the M4, the A55 or elsewhere—and that the failure of the Welsh Government to commit to this is a “body blow”, according to the Road Haulage Association director, Geraint Davies?

[Dr Davies]

I absolutely do; my hon. Friend makes an excellent point. The Welsh Government’s response to the roads review is more of a roadblock, sadly. Their opposition to the M4 relief road and other schemes continues to hold the Welsh economy back. The Welsh Government’s impact assessment suggests that the impact of the 20-mile-an-hour default speed limit could be as much as £4.5 billion. The Welsh Government, I am afraid, are advertising that Wales is closed for business.

Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Bill (First sitting)

Debate between James Davies and Andrew Selous

Committee Debate: 1st sitting: House of Commons
Tuesday 8th November 2016 Public Bill Committees

[Andrew Selous]

Q What is the general perception about operating within the UK then among the members?

David Watson: I think that we would all say that the UK has had a strong life sciences sector. We have a very strong, productive pharmaceutical sector. Lots of current medicines have been discovered here. It is a challenging market, to put it in those terms, to operate in for companies. It is increasingly challenging for a number of reasons, not just the commercial environment.

[Dr Davies]

Q We have received correspondence from an individual who takes liothyronine, as does one of my constituents who is affected by the current issues. He has pointed out that the company that manufactures that makes an excess profit of £50,000 a day as a result of the hike in prices. With that in mind, do you think that the proposed maximum fine, the penalty of £100,000 or £10,000 a day, is sufficient?

David Watson: I am not aware of the individual product. We support the Bill in so far as the Government need to be able to have the powers to step in where they spot that there have been price hikes that are not justified. It is entirely appropriate that the Department is able to question companies on why that price has gone up. If it has gone up unreasonably, it is entirely correct that they should reduce it. What I would say, though, is that the majority of branded medicines, for example, covered by the PPRS, have an affordability mechanism underneath them. For example, we repay under the PPRS the difference in NHS spend on medicines; so regardless of the list price, which is often quoted for medicines, very often there are significant deals being made underneath that with the NHS.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between James Davies and Andrew Selous

Tuesday 26th April 2016 Commons Chamber

[Dr James Davies (Vale of Clwyd) (Con)]

6. What progress his Department has made on ensuring that offenders are engaged in meaningful work in prison.

[The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Andrew Selous)]

We want prisons to be places of hard work and high ambition. That is why we will give governors more autonomy and hold them to account by publishing employment outcomes for prisoners so that we can compare results between prisons.

--- Later in debate ---

[Dr James Davies]

Is the Minister aware of an outstanding pathfinder project at North Wales Women’s Centre in Rhyl, in my constituency, which offers holistic support to women offenders in line with recommendations in the Corston report? Will he join me in urging the Government to pursue improved provision and rehabilitation for women offenders to help to avoid the cost and family disruption of incarceration for relatively minor offences?

[Andrew Selous]

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for drawing the House’s attention to the good work of the North Wales Women’s Centre, and I commend it for what it does. The Government are committed to supporting vulnerable women to turn their lives around, and we plan to expand that important work.