All 4 Debates between Ian C. Lucas and Lord Barker of Battle

Thu 9th Feb 2012
Feed-in Tariffs
Commons Chamber
(Urgent Question)
Mon 31st Oct 2011
Feed-in Tariffs
Commons Chamber
(Urgent Question)

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Ian C. Lucas and Lord Barker of Battle
Thursday 16th January 2014

(10 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Ian C. Lucas Portrait Ian Lucas (Wrexham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

T3. When I met three businesses in Wrexham last Friday, they told me that the green deal was not working for them or for consumers. Will the Minister confirm that 99% of applications for the green deal do not proceed to completion?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait The Minister of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change (Gregory Barker)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Certainly not; I do not recognise that figure at all. In fact, new research published today says that over 80% of people who have a green deal assessment are extremely satisfied with it, and only 5% of those who have an assessment—over 117,000 have been undertaken so far—do not go on to install some of the measures that it recommends. We are not only assessing but implementing, and Labour Members need to get over it.

Feed-in Tariffs

Debate between Ian C. Lucas and Lord Barker of Battle
Thursday 9th February 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There is to be a dramatic reduction in the tariff for small-scale wind. We had to take a hard look at it on a value-for-money basis, and as a result we are having to reduce it substantially to 21p. We must make it clear that we can justify paying a significant subsidy to individual technologies only if there is a real chance that they will reach a point at which they are cost-competitive with other mainstream renewables, and indeed fossil fuels, in the relatively near future. Unfortunately, that case has not been made so far in relation to small-scale wind, but I hope that the industry will respond with proposals for innovation and plans to make its technologies more cost-competitive.

Ian C. Lucas Portrait Ian Lucas (Wrexham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Is the Minister aware that following his chaotic stewardship in DECC, the biggest barrier to the success of the solar industry in this country is him?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am afraid that the hon. Gentleman is talking absolute rubbish. We in DECC have really good engagement with the industry. The stakeholders will be in my office in about an hour and a half, and I look forward to a sensible, grown-up, constructive discussion with them.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Ian C. Lucas and Lord Barker of Battle
Thursday 26th January 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I would be delighted to meet my hon. Friend to discuss the matter. Obviously we want to build a consensus on the way forward. I will publish plans for the reform of the feed-in tariff so that we can put it on a much sounder footing and learn from the mistakes of the system we inherited.

Ian C. Lucas Portrait Ian Lucas (Wrexham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

What assessment has the Secretary of State made of the Government’s liability for their unlawful actions in bringing in the feed-in tariff consultation?

Feed-in Tariffs

Debate between Ian C. Lucas and Lord Barker of Battle
Monday 31st October 2011

(13 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am happy to meet my hon. Friend, but he must understand that the one thing that would be absolutely wrong would be to encourage these firms to rush forward in a burst of growth knowing that the money would run out in a matter of months. A sustainable pathway for growth is what they need.

Ian C. Lucas Portrait Ian Lucas (Wrexham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

On a day when the Government are saying that they are in favour of jobs and growth, I find it extraordinary that the Minister is standing at the Dispatch Box and criticising Labour Members for arguing for small businesses which have invested on the basis of Government policy. These businesses will be completely shafted in six weeks’ time by his decision not to implement a satisfactory stable investment framework. What impact does he think his decision today will have on future investment in the solar industry in the UK?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I find this scaremongering and doom-mongering from Labour Members to be absolutely reprehensible. We are taking the scheme back to the same rate of return as when it was launched 18 months ago. We are simply trying to reduce the bubble created by the ineffective scheme set up by Labour. We believe in a sustainable path for growth, not in boom and bust like the Labour party.