To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.

Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

MP Expense Claim
Hugh Robertson (Conservative - Faversham and Mid Kent)
Date
Thu 19th Feb 2015
412647
Type
Office Costs
(Const Office Tel. Usage/Rental)
Description
Mobile Phone Costs for February
Vodafone
Amount
£10.50
Paid
MP Expense Claim
Hugh Robertson (Conservative - Faversham and Mid Kent)
Date
Tue 17th Feb 2015
412511
Type
Staff Travel
(Public Tr RAIL MP Staff - RTN)
Description
Return Train fare for member of Constituency Staff
Train Fare
Between London & Constituency
From: Staplehurst
To: London
Amount
£41.10
Paid
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Feb 2015 - Infrastructure Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Hugh Robertson (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 231 Conservative Aye votes vs 5 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 203
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Feb 2015 - Tax Avoidance - View Vote Context
Hugh Robertson (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 247 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 286
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Feb 2015 - Tax Avoidance - View Vote Context
Hugh Robertson (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 250 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 289 Noes - 208
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Feb 2015 - Compulsory Jobs Guarantee - View Vote Context
Hugh Robertson (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 259 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 301
Division Vote (Commons)
10 Feb 2015 - Police - View Vote Context
Hugh Robertson (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 240 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 212
Division Vote (Commons)
10 Feb 2015 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context
Hugh Robertson (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 244 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 190
MP Expense Claim
Hugh Robertson (Conservative - Faversham and Mid Kent)
Date
Mon 9th Feb 2015
411036
Type
Office Costs
(Internet Usage/Rental)
Description
Broadband for iPad January
T-Mobile Broadband
Amount
£15.32
Paid
Written Question
United Nations: Military Decorations
Monday 9th February 2015

Asked by: Hugh Robertson (Conservative - Faversham and Mid Kent)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 22 January 2015 to Question 221266, what steps his Department took to inform all those members of the UK Armed Forces who served with the British Detachment in Sarajevo during the qualifying period of their eligibility to receive the medal, including those who had left the Armed Forces.

Answered by Anna Soubry

UK Service personnel were not additionally eligible for the UNPROFOR Medal, the United Nations Special Service Medal, the NATO Medal, or the WEU Mission Service Medal in respect of the same period of operational service. Permission to accept and wear more than one of these medals will have been granted only when each period of qualifying service could be clearly differentiated. Concurrent qualification was not admissible.

Applications to receive the UN Special Service medal within 12 months of leaving theatre was a directive issued by the United Nations, to which the UK was obliged to adhere.

Information regarding eligibility to receive the medal in recognition of Service with the British Detachment in Sarajevo was originally promulgated to Armed Forces personnel and Ministry of Defence staff through Defence Council Instructions. This was the usual method of issuing instructions and guidance pertaining to medals at that time. For those who had already left service, information was available from their relevant medal office or Regimental Association.