Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Helen Grant and Guy Opperman
Thursday 27th November 2014

(10 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Helen Grant Portrait Mrs Grant
- Hansard - -

Sport England and UK Sport together do a very good job in supporting not only elite sport, but grass-roots sport.

Guy Opperman Portrait Guy Opperman (Hexham) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

T5. As a cricketer, I echo the sympathies for the wonderful Phil Hughes, whose loss is tragic. I welcome the announcement that Ponteland middle school will have a new artificial grass football pitch funded by the Premier League, the Football Association and Sport England. May I urge the DCMS to carry out an audit of all my constituency so that other pitches may be installed very soon?

Helen Grant Portrait Mrs Grant
- Hansard - -

I am delighted that Ponteland community middle school has been successful in its application. Artificial pitches are amazing and increase participation, community involvement and talent development, which is how we will grow the game. I am happy to look, with my hon. Friend, at what scope there might be for further projects.

Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Bill

Debate between Helen Grant and Guy Opperman
Wednesday 26th March 2014

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Helen Grant Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (Mrs Helen Grant)
- Hansard - -

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

The Lords amendment gives the Secretary of State reserve powers to extend the horserace betting levy to all bookmakers holding a remote operating licence from the Gambling Commission after the remote gambling Bill has been enacted. The amendment is fully in keeping with the context and purpose of the Bill, which is about levelling the playing field for bookmakers engaging with British punters.

Subsections (1) and (2) are broadly drafted to ensure that the Secretary of State can make all the changes necessary to secure extension compatible with the UK’s obligations under European Union law. Members may recall that we resisted previous levy amendments because we believed they failed to offer that necessary scope.

Subsection (3) provides that secondary legislation introduced under this amendment will be subject to affirmative procedure in both Houses of Parliament. Subsection (4) makes it clear that existing provisions to abolish the levy once a suitable replacement has been found are unaffected by the amendment.

We have tabled our own amendment because we are persuaded that a statutory levy should be applied fairly, but we remain firmly of the view that the need for genuine levy reform cannot be satisfied through extension to offshore remote bookmakers alone. That is why this amendment is part of a wider levy reform package, which was announced by the Chancellor a week ago in the Budget. We will now move forward very quickly on two concurrent pieces of work.

On extending the levy, we will seek to complete all of the necessary work in time for the 2015 negotiations on the 55th levy scheme, which will apply from April 2016. The timing will, of course, be subject to the outcome of discussions with the European Commission, which began last Friday. We hope to launch a consultation in May on the mechanics of extension.

Guy Opperman Portrait Guy Opperman (Hexham) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my hon. Friend agree that this announcement and today’s developments are very good news for racing, which provides tremendous support for jobs and local tourism, and that it is good that the Government are now beginning to work properly with British racing?

Helen Grant Portrait Mrs Grant
- Hansard - -

I know that my hon. Friend, as a former jockey, has a deep and intimate knowledge of the industry. He makes an excellent point and that is precisely why we are making these reforms.

Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Bill

Debate between Helen Grant and Guy Opperman
Tuesday 5th November 2013

(11 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Guy Opperman Portrait Guy Opperman (Hexham) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I support the Bill, and I agree with its aim to ensure that there is a level playing field. Will my hon. Friend tell the House what financial benefits the Bill will bring to the Government and the taxpayer?

Helen Grant Portrait Mrs Grant
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend makes a good point about the level playing field; that is certainly what the Bill sets out to achieve. However, this is about consumer protection, which is an important feature of the legislation. Taxation matters are ones for the Chancellor of the Exchequer.