Mitochondrial Replacement (Public Safety) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department of Health and Social Care

Mitochondrial Replacement (Public Safety)

Guy Opperman Excerpts
Monday 1st September 2014

(10 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Fiona Bruce Portrait Fiona Bruce
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I can respond in this way. In the general science, concerns have been referred to. A mismatch between nuclear and the mitochondrial DNA could cause severe health problems in children conceived with this technique: problems such as infertility, reduced growth, impaired learning, faster ageing and early death. Are those not sufficiently serious for us to be extremely concerned?

Guy Opperman Portrait Guy Opperman (Hexham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I support the work to combat this terrible disease, some of which is being pioneered by my local university, Newcastle, and I will be urging the Government to proceed with the trials, but the question is this. The new IVF technique that has been pioneered at Newcastle has proved to be successful in the laboratory, but the current law prevents it from being tested in a clinical trial or used in clinical practice. That is what we need to change. Without those clinical trials, we cannot progress and deal with this terrible disease.

Fiona Bruce Portrait Fiona Bruce
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is very interesting but the point I am making is that at the moment such clinical trials would involve children. Two peer-reviewed articles in Nature have suggested that mitochondrial transfer is inherently risky, one of them citing a figure of 52% of embryos created through MST having chromosomal abnormalities.