Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Oral Answers to Questions

Greg Mulholland Excerpts
Monday 7th April 2014

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What is so puzzling about the hon. Lady’s question is that she cannot explain why every attempt that we have made to make it easier to convert existing property—offices, shops and agricultural buildings—into housing has been opposed by the Labour party. Labour Members cannot have it both ways: either they want to maximise the number of houses derived from existing property or they do not; but they cannot preach one thing and do the other.

Greg Mulholland Portrait Greg Mulholland (Leeds North West) (LD)
- Hansard - -

The community in the Headingley and Hyde Park area of Leeds was dismayed last week when councillors disgracefully voted in favour of the development of a supermarket and housing on a playing field, which could have been a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to secure the Olympic legacy. An asset of community value application was in place, so what advice can the Minister give the community on urgently challenging the decision and stopping the development going ahead until the ACV application has been heard?

Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend will understand that I cannot comment on any particular application. Of course, I do not know precisely where that decision is, but he is always entitled to write to me or the Secretary of State to ask us to call in a decision, especially if it is more than locally controversial or challenges an important national policy area, such as the protection of playing fields.