All 2 Debates between Graham Stuart and Callum McCaig

Energy Bill [Lords]

Debate between Graham Stuart and Callum McCaig
Wednesday 20th April 2016

(8 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Callum McCaig Portrait Callum McCaig
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There were two different aspects, and we had a number of debates. The hon. Gentleman asked how we would do something, but we cannot do it—pure and simple. Let me return to the nub of the matter. People would like pragmatic government, but we are seeing dogmatic government that dismisses the views of communities.

Graham Stuart Portrait Graham Stuart (Beverley and Holderness) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Callum McCaig Portrait Callum McCaig
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am coming to a close. Such dogmatic government is making communities withdraw their support, and I urge the Government to show pragmatism today.

Energy Bill [Lords]

Debate between Graham Stuart and Callum McCaig
Monday 18th January 2016

(8 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Graham Stuart Portrait Graham Stuart
- Hansard - -

Does the hon. Gentleman agree on these two things: first, that while we are burning oil and gas, it might as well be our own; and, secondly, that saying we are subsidising oil and gas simply because we tax it slightly less is a false narrative?

Callum McCaig Portrait Callum McCaig
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree very much with the hon. Gentleman. It strikes me that there are certain parallels with the coal conversation moments ago. That situation could come to pass if we do not support the North sea. We need to transition away from oil and gas, but that will take some time given the economics at play. If we are using oil and gas—we will be doing so for the foreseeable future—it might as well be ours. We might as well get the economic benefit of it, and we should certainly use that economic benefit to try to diversify and invest in other areas. The hon. Gentleman made the point on subsidies. The oil and gas sector is taxed very highly, and more highly than any other sector of which I am aware. It is taxed less than it was, but we probably require it to be taxed less if we are to see the benefit of the industry in future.

The OGA is vital to that future and it is hugely important that it is put on a firm footing. It must be given the regulatory powers it requires and the ability to engage fully with industry on access to infrastructure, plans for investment and so on. I very much support the Government in ensuring that the OGA continues to have a laser-like focus on maximising economic recovery, which is fundamental to that purpose. Over the years, there have been umpteen changes to oil and gas. It is in the nature of the industry, with its huge capacity to generate income, that the goalposts have changed substantially during that time, but I plead with all hon. Members not to change the goalposts again. The industry has been working for two years towards proposals on maximising economic recovery, which have universal buy-in and require that the OGA’s focus is not complicated.