All 1 Debates between Glenda Jackson and Lord Evans of Rainow

Academies Bill [Lords]

Debate between Glenda Jackson and Lord Evans of Rainow
Wednesday 21st July 2010

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Glenda Jackson Portrait Glenda Jackson
- Hansard - -

That is an extremely salient point, and one is left wondering why the Bill has to be rushed through in such a short space of time. I personally have received no comfort from the Minister when it has been pointed out during this afternoon’s debate that we are running into the long summer holidays and he has replied, “Well, work is going on and schools will open in September.” We do not know which schools they are. I am secretly hoping that the Minister will, with the best will in the world and not because of his own individual failure, be proved wrong on this matter, as his Secretary of State was when he made his five varying announcements on which schools would or would not be in the Building Schools for the Future programme.

Lord Evans of Rainow Portrait Graham Evans (Weaver Vale) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

May I ask the hon. Lady to clarify something? Did she pass the 11-plus?

Glenda Jackson Portrait Glenda Jackson
- Hansard - -

Somebody else who does not listen—you are not the listening party, are you?

The Bill’s measures would take us back to a position to which we really should not want to return. As we all know, we are living in an ever more competitive world, and the greatest national resource we have is our people—their talent, their energy, their ability, their creativity. The future of this country is dependent upon our young people, and on our being able to deliver to them the best possible education, but it must be the best possible education we can deliver to all our children and young people, not just a selected, or selective, few. So I sincerely hope that the amendments that have already been presented will be accepted by the Committee, because this is the heart of the Bill and the Committee should reject the Bill as it stands.