All 2 Debates between Gareth Johnson and Edward Argar

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Gareth Johnson and Edward Argar
Tuesday 21st November 2023

(1 year, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Edward Argar Portrait Edward Argar
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

If the hon. Lady would like to write to me, I will be happy to look into that specific case. But in broad terms, in the last financial year this Government invested £217 million in capital and maintenance spending, up from £149 million in 2010-2011. That includes, since 2020, delivering £73 million of capital maintenance projects across Yorkshire. Security is not a dirty word in this context but is vital to creating conditions in which people can be safe and rehabilitated. We continue to work closely with the NHS on improving things such as mental health support for those in prison, but I am happy to engage with her on this issue.

Gareth Johnson Portrait Gareth Johnson (Dartford) (Con)
- Hansard - -

12. If the Government will make an assessment of the potential merits of extending the unduly lenient sentence scheme to include additional offences.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Gareth Johnson and Edward Argar
Tuesday 12th September 2023

(1 year, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Gareth Johnson Portrait Gareth Johnson (Dartford) (Con)
- Hansard - -

11. What steps his Department is taking to help ensure that offenders attend their sentencing.

Edward Argar Portrait The Minister of State, Ministry of Justice (Edward Argar)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is right that those convicted of a crime face up to its consequences by being in court when they are sentenced. On 30 August, the Lord Chancellor announced his intention to legislate as soon as parliamentary time allows to enable judges to order an offender to attend court for sentencing, making it clear in legislation that reasonable force can be used to compel attendance and that refusal to comply with a judge’s order will cause the offender to face up to two years in custody.

Gareth Johnson Portrait Gareth Johnson
- View Speech - Hansard - -

In 2014, Colin Ash-Smith was convicted of murdering 16-year-old Claire Tiltman in my constituency of Dartford. His final insult to her was to refuse to attend the sentencing hearing, so I welcome the proposed changes to compel defendants to face up to the consequences of their actions. However, can the Minister confirm that there will be an opportunity for judges to hear representations from the prosecution, defence, and security staff before such action is taken?

Edward Argar Portrait Edward Argar
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful to my hon. Friend, and I hope he will allow me this opportunity to express my sympathy to the friends and family of Claire Tiltman, who lived in his constituency and, in 1993, was tragically murdered. I was glad to see her murderer brought to justice after so many years. Colin Ash-Smith, like Lucy Letby, was cowardly for not attending the sentencing hearing to face up to his appalling crime. Each case is different, so it is important that the court and the judge have discretion in how to make an attendance order, and in reaching that decision—although we are working through the details—we would expect the courts to consider the full circumstances of each individual case, including any representations made by the prosecution or the defence in that context.