Oral Answers to Questions

Fleur Anderson Excerpts
Tuesday 13th October 2026

(1 day, 11 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Martin McCluskey Portrait Martin McCluskey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I welcome the hon. Gentleman to his new position. He would not expect me to stand here and make commitments that will be made by the Chancellor at the Budget at the end of this month. The hon. Gentleman’s party is trying to make us more dependent on fossil fuels, and to turn back the clock on the future homes standard—changes that would leave people across the country tens of thousands of pounds worse off.

Fleur Anderson Portrait Fleur Anderson (Putney) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

9. What assessment she has made of the potential impact of approval of the Rosebank oil and gas field on the UK’s ability to meet its climate change targets.

Michael Shanks Portrait The Minister for Energy (Michael Shanks)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Given that a regulatory process is under way, I cannot comment on particular projects. However, we have been very clear that any consenting decisions for new oil and gas must be compatible with our climate obligations. We have set that out at every stage of the process, since we inherited the court judgments on the previous Government’s handling of those consent decisions.

Fleur Anderson Portrait Fleur Anderson
- Hansard - -

Many of my constituents in Putney have written to me about this. They are very concerned about Rosebank’s lifetime emissions, which are equivalent to 254 million tonnes of CO2. As many colleagues have mentioned, this summer, we had extreme weather. The London ambulance service said that it had more call-outs this summer, because of the heatwave, than it did during covid. With that background, can the Minister tell me whether approving Rosebank is compatible with the UK’s climate targets and obligations under the Paris agreement?

Michael Shanks Portrait Michael Shanks
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Let me reiterate that I cannot comment on particular projects that are being considered for decisions. On the more general point that my hon. Friend rightly raises, it is imperative that we look at the impact that climate change is having. We all lived through this summer, and have seen the evidence of climate change up close. It is important that any decisions we make are compatible with our climate obligations. As even the Conservatives have now accepted, it is worth remembering that any new projects in the North sea will not take a penny off bills.