Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Oral Answers to Questions

Fiona Mactaggart Excerpts
Thursday 8th September 2011

(13 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Hugh Robertson Portrait Hugh Robertson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Of course I do. My hon. Friend will be delighted to know that I had the opportunity to meet a number of the Lincoln Ladies players during a visit to the city on 14 June. There is no doubt that the new league has been a fantastic success and I hope it will be a great driver of more women playing football.

Fiona Mactaggart Portrait Fiona Mactaggart (Slough) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Will the Minister raise with the FA its girls’ talent development programme, which has meant that my constituent, Jaime Gotch, who used to go to the Watford centre, is now left without any support for her very talented football career?

Hugh Robertson Portrait Hugh Robertson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I certainly will. I visited the Watford centre before the election when I was in opposition.

Fiona Mactaggart Portrait Fiona Mactaggart
- Hansard - -

It’s closed.

Hugh Robertson Portrait Hugh Robertson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I know; that was my point. If the hon. Lady wishes to write to me or directly to the FA, I will see what we can do to help.

--- Later in debate ---
David Heath Portrait Mr Heath
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think it would be entirely improper for me to answer on behalf of the Backbench Business Committee, but let me make it clear that we have provided a way for the public to engage with Parliament. What the petitioners want, presumably, is for the topic they have raised either to be dealt with effectively by the Government or to be debated in due course by the House when the opportunity arises. The idea that when a petition reached the threshold there would be an immediate debate is not the purpose of the site, but it does mean that proper consideration is given to whether the matter has been debated or will be debated in another form or whether the Government have changed their policy to meet the concerns, which may be the case in relation to at least one of the petitions that has already reached the required threshold.

Fiona Mactaggart Portrait Fiona Mactaggart (Slough) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

But does the Minister agree with the Daily Mail, which says that this amounts to an e-petition con? The Government said to the public, “If 100,000 of you sign one of these petitions, there’ll be a debate.” What discussion did the Government have with the Backbench Business Committee about how the time for those debates would be allocated?

David Heath Portrait Mr Heath
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

May I caution the hon. Lady, first against reading the Daily Mail, and secondly against agreeing with what it says? The Government have never said that when a petition reaches the threshold it will have an automatic right of debate. It will be considered with a view to seeing whether the matter raised has already been debated or is already going to be debated in a different context or whether the request has already been met by the Government. If there is then a need to debate something that the public have registered as an interest, the Backbench Business Committee will respond to that request. That seems to me an entirely proper way of doing things and it is a huge improvement on the old No. 10 petition site on which the petitions went precisely nowhere.