All 2 Debates between Felicity Buchan and Christopher Chope

Inter Faith Network Closure

Debate between Felicity Buchan and Christopher Chope
Thursday 22nd February 2024

(10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Felicity Buchan Portrait Felicity Buchan
- View Speech - Hansard - -

As I have said, very proper consideration went into this decision after we had heard representations from the Inter Faith Network. The decision on Government funding has now been made. We have always been clear that the Inter Faith Network needs to develop alternative sources of funding; institutions such as these cannot be solely reliant on Government funding.

Christopher Chope Portrait Sir Christopher Chope (Christchurch) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Is that not the point? This organisation has had about £2 million in income in the past five years, and three quarters of that income has come from the Government—from the taxpayer. Is not the message for other organisations that they should not be too dependent on taxpayer funding?

Felicity Buchan Portrait Felicity Buchan
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My hon. Friend has expressed that point very well.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Felicity Buchan and Christopher Chope
Monday 21st November 2022

(2 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Felicity Buchan Portrait Felicity Buchan
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I wish to give all my condolences to the family of Awaab. Clearly, it is simply unacceptable in today’s world that a young boy can die in that way. I am committed, as I have said, to implementing a decent homes standard and to making sure that the enforcement of it is strict.

Christopher Chope Portrait Sir Christopher Chope (Christchurch) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

How will abolishing section 21 increase the supply of rented housing?

Felicity Buchan Portrait Felicity Buchan
- View Speech - Hansard - -

We are looking to abolish section 21 at the same time as we strengthen the grounds for landlords to take possession of their properties if they have a good reason to do so—that could be because of antisocial behaviour, rent arrears, or needing to sell the property. The two go in tandem, but it is absolutely imperative that we go ahead with the abolition of section 21.