Economy and City Link: Coventry Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Education

Economy and City Link: Coventry

Eleanor Laing Excerpts
Friday 23rd January 2015

(9 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Geoffrey Robinson Portrait Mr Geoffrey Robinson (Coventry North West) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker—[Interruption.]

Eleanor Laing Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Mrs Eleanor Laing)
- Hansard - -

Order. I hesitate to interrupt the hon. Gentleman, but I ask the Serjeant at Arms to investigate the fact that a bell is ringing somewhere.

Jim Cunningham Portrait Mr Jim Cunningham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I apologise, Madam Deputy Speaker—I did not realise that my phone was not switched off.

Eleanor Laing Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

I take back that request to the Serjeant at Arms and accept the hon. Gentleman’s apology. The mystery has been solved.

Geoffrey Robinson Portrait Mr Robinson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker, for allowing me to take part in this debate. The Minister also agreed to my taking part, as did my hon. Friend the Member for Coventry South (Mr Cunningham), whom I congratulate on his initiative. I also thank Mr Speaker for granting this important debate.

The only mystery that remains to be solved is why exactly Jon Moulton made this acquisition in the way he did in an industry that was already in difficulty. One feared very much what the outcome would be for a company that had already experienced many years of extreme difficulty. The situation will no doubt be unfolded once the Department finishes its report and we have read its conclusions. Perhaps a further investigation will be necessary; indeed, my hon. Friend has called for one.

In the few minutes available to me, I want to address four aspects of concern. My hon. Friend has already said that we cannot be complacent in Coventry, but perhaps he will agree that the new leadership in Coventry has sent a very loud message that Coventry is open for business and to the new businesses of the 21st century. The internet and internet shopping are clearly going to generate a lot of such businesses. Indeed, we thought that that was what Mr Moulton was investing in and that there was a reasonable prospect for City Link’s future, although there was never any guarantee. It is a pity that the early venture has come to such a tragic and sad halt.

It is tremendous to see the approach being taken by Coventry’s leadership. After years of not making the progress we should have been making, the new leader, supported by her deputy, has made it plain that things have changed in Coventry’s approach to openness. We are looking to do things differently and are encouraging others to join us in a way that we might not have done in the past. It is in that spirit that we went down the City Link and other routes.