Flood Defences Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateEarl of Kinnoull
Main Page: Earl of Kinnoull (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary)Department Debates - View all Earl of Kinnoull's debates with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
(8 years, 10 months ago)
Lords Chamber The Lord Privy Seal (Baroness Evans of Bowes Park) (Con)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            The Lord Privy Seal (Baroness Evans of Bowes Park) (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, it is the turn of the Cross Benches.
 The Earl of Kinnoull
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            The Earl of Kinnoull 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, I am grateful. I declare my insurance and farming interests as set out in the register of the House. Does the Minister agree with me on two points? First, Flood Re is very much in its start-up phase—it began trading only in April this year, and 53,000 policies is, in insurance terms, not very many—and the concept will really be proven when the first claims are successfully settled and paid. Secondly, once that is done, however, it would be sensible for the Government to engage the relevant parties in conversation about extending the concept of Flood Re—which is different from Flood Re itself—to small businesses, which I think would be greatly to the benefit of this country.
 Lord Gardiner of Kimble
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Gardiner of Kimble 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, I am conscious of the noble Earl’s experience in the insurance industry, but it is fair to say that Flood Re is financed to cover up to £2.1 billion in claims. To give a sense of scale, that is seven times worse than the flooding in 2007. I hope that the BIBA product will advance further understanding of how best businesses, and small businesses in particular, can avail themselves of what the noble Earl described: a Flood Re-concept policy.