Game Birds (Cage Breeding) Bill [HL] Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateDepartment: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Earl of Erroll
Main Page: Earl of Erroll (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary)Department Debates - View all Earl of Erroll's debates with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Game Birds (Cage Breeding) Bill [HL]
Earl of Erroll ExcerptsFriday 25th March 2022
(2 years, 8 months ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Game Birds (Cage Breeding) Bill [HL] 2021-22 View all Game Birds (Cage Breeding) Bill [HL] 2021-22 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
The Earl of Erroll (CB)
My Lords, I am sorry to intervene, but I asked whether I could quickly make a comment in the gap after listening to the debate. I am afraid that I have been abroad and did not get my name down in time.
The problem with the Bill is that it is trying to put together raised laying units and battery cages as if these were the same thing, and it is trying to trigger an emotional response in people to condemn both. I am not a game breeder myself at all, but I have read research which says that the raised laying units which are outside, have space in them and even give an enhanced environment and things like that are more hygienic and better for the birds, and you get less disease. That is a very different concept from battery cages, about which I know absolutely nothing. The least we can do in the interests of the birds is to give them the better, hygienic conditions. At the end of the day, this is not about trying to ban everything, but I think it is counterproductive if you deliberately make it worse for the birds in law. That is really all I want to say.