Debates between Earl of Courtown and Lord Luce during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Tue 10th Nov 2015

Chagos Islands

Debate between Earl of Courtown and Lord Luce
Tuesday 10th November 2015

(9 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Luce Portrait Lord Luce
- Hansard - - - Excerpts



To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they expect to complete their policy review of resettlement in the Chagos Islands.

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the Government’s public consultation about a potential resettlement of the British Indian Ocean Territory concluded on 27 October. We are now examining the results and hope to take a decision on the way ahead soon. This 12-week consultation drew views from around 1,200 Chagossians and continues the conversation with Chagossian communities as part of our review of resettlement policy, which started in 2012. That included an independent feasibility study, which concluded at the end of January 2015.

Lord Luce Portrait Lord Luce (CB)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, this week is the 50th anniversary of the decision to provide a United States base in Diego Garcia, on British territory and in the Indian Ocean, which then led to the decision to deport 1,500 Chagossians, most of whom were indigenous inhabitants. As the KPMG report, commissioned by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, has this year concluded that there is no reason why resettlement should not take place, will the Government make next year’s renewal of the agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom conditional on a commitment by both parties to facilitate and support resettlement of the Chagossians, thus rectifying a grave human rights injustice?

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - -

My Lords, Her Majesty’s Government regret the way the Chagossians were removed from the British Indian Ocean Territory in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The Government, along with successive Governments before them, have said that what happened was clearly wrong. This is why substantial compensation was rightly paid. The noble Lord mentioned the renewal of the agreement with the American military for occupation of Diego Garcia and we will, no doubt, take these matters into account.