Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Dennis Skinner and Charles Hendry
Thursday 12th July 2012

(12 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Charles Hendry Portrait Charles Hendry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Let me reassure my hon. Friend that we will always keep an open mind in regard to new evidence. The problem with the Dungeness site was that development there was not compatible with the EC habitats directive. The Government’s major infrastructure environment unit is continuing to investigate, and if there is additional evidence, I shall be pleased to meet my hon. Friend at any time to discuss it.

Dennis Skinner Portrait Mr Dennis Skinner (Bolsover) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

If the Minister is happy to meet the nuclear generation people, will he also take an interest in coal? We have 100 years’ worth of coal beneath our feet, and it is high time the Government paid some attention to the industry. Not many pits are left, and some of those are in jeopardy. It is high time the Minister met those people, together with the National Union of Mineworkers.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Dennis Skinner and Charles Hendry
Thursday 17th May 2012

(12 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Charles Hendry Portrait Charles Hendry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely correct, because we cannot ignore what is happening elsewhere around the world. The gas price in the United States is now one quarter of that in Europe and one seventh of that in Asia, so this is a game-changing technology. However, our commitment is absolutely clear: for this to go ahead, we have to have the tightest regulatory controls and the greatest focus on environmental protection. This is a densely populated island, we have to have public support for this technology going forward and we intend to go about this in a very constructive way, involving all the expert opinion we can.

Dennis Skinner Portrait Mr Dennis Skinner (Bolsover) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Is there not another side to all this? Does not the process use a vast amount of water and involve chemicals as well? It runs counter to all this green deal talk that we hear so often. Will the Minister ensure that all those reservations are taken fully into account?

Charles Hendry Portrait Charles Hendry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Let me give the hon. Gentleman an absolute assurance that all those issues will be completely taken into account. The fluid used is 99% water and there are already very strict controls on how it is used and on what happens after it has been through the process. There are very strong regulations, too, on how the fracking activity is separated from the water table and they are often several thousand feet apart. All those issues will be considered with the greatest care before we go forward. We believe that this technology has real potential, but it must be used in the safest possible way.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Dennis Skinner and Charles Hendry
Thursday 7th July 2011

(13 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Charles Hendry Portrait Charles Hendry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I was very pleased to have the chance earlier this week to talk about those issues with Bentley, which is of course a world-class engineering company based in my hon. Friend’s constituency. I shall be in touch with his office later today to fix a visit in the coming weeks.

Dennis Skinner Portrait Mr Dennis Skinner (Bolsover) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Will the Secretary of State reflect further on the anaerobic digester plants that are close to and in built-up areas? Is he aware that the stuff being carried by lorries trundling through the village of Whitwell in my constituency is not the green deal but brown and stinks to high heaven? What does he have to say to the people there?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Dennis Skinner and Charles Hendry
Thursday 11th November 2010

(14 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Dennis Skinner Portrait Mr Dennis Skinner (Bolsover) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Does the Minister recall that a couple of months ago I raised with him the question of planning applications for the installing of wind turbines close to villages? I asked him if the Department had decided whether the turbines should be 5 km or 2 km away, and I had the impression that he would have a look at it. Has he made his mind up yet?

Charles Hendry Portrait Charles Hendry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman has raised an important point on which there is strong feeling on both sides of the House. We do not believe that that sort of distance restriction is appropriate, although we know that a different approach is taken in Scotland. We think it important for local communities to own the decisions, which is why we have a localism agenda. We want such developments to have the active buy-in and support of local communities, and we are determined to deliver that.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Dennis Skinner and Charles Hendry
Thursday 1st July 2010

(14 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Charles Hendry Portrait Charles Hendry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are looking at the structure of ROCs at the moment. We are absolutely clear that biofuels have a role to play, but it must be sustainable. That point will be at the heart of the way in which we look forward on such issues.

Dennis Skinner Portrait Mr Dennis Skinner (Bolsover) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The Minister said earlier that he objected to the idea of 150-foot turbines near villages, so is there a planning rule of thumb emerging, of, say, 1, 2 or 5 km away?

Charles Hendry Portrait Charles Hendry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I did not say that I objected to them; I said that local communities had the right to object to them. That goes to the heart of local democracy. What we are saying is that local voices have to be heard in the process, and we are absolutely committed to making that happen. We have not set a rule for how far wind turbines should be from habitation—we share that position with the previous Government—because the one house that they are near could be the house of the person who wants to put them up. Therefore, having a rule would be to take a completely self-defeating approach.