All 2 Debates between Dawn Butler and Philippa Whitford

Junior Doctors’ Contracts

Debate between Dawn Butler and Philippa Whitford
Wednesday 28th October 2015

(9 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Philippa Whitford Portrait Dr Whitford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There is no doubt that we require dialogue, but it must involve sitting down at a table without preconditions. What we had in July and through the summer was a threat of imposing a contract, instead of proper negotiation. That is where we should be trying to get to: both sides negotiating in good faith across a blank sheet of paper. The threat of imposition is what has hurt the junior doctors.

There has also been talk of taking away the guaranteed income protection of GP trainees, there to try to keep them at the same level as they were, and replacing it with a discretionary payment. Such a payment can be taken away at any time—it can be cut and it can be changed. The Secretary of State aspires to have 5,000 extra GPs by 2020. We know from the BMA that one third of GPs—10,000 out of just over 30,000—are planning to leave, which means we need to find 15,000 extra GPs. Anything that is a disincentive for people to go into that profession is not serving the NHS.

Dawn Butler Portrait Dawn Butler (Brent Central) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Does the hon. Lady think the Secretary of State is an incentive or a disincentive to junior doctors?

Philippa Whitford Portrait Dr Whitford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Sorry, I did not hear that. [Interruption.]

Dawn Butler Portrait Dawn Butler
- Hansard - -

Conservative Members do not want me to repeat the question. Does the hon. Lady think the Secretary of State is an incentive or a disincentive to doctors?

Philippa Whitford Portrait Dr Whitford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think that how this has been handled is a total disincentive, but that could change. We could simply take the decision to move to negotiations without preconditions—without the threat of imposition. We are talking about a threat to impose changes to the terms and conditions of people who, in the past, routinely worked more than 100 hours a week, as I did. That is a ghost that haunts the NHS and it really frightens junior doctors.

A&E Services

Debate between Dawn Butler and Philippa Whitford
Wednesday 24th June 2015

(9 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Philippa Whitford Portrait Dr Philippa Whitford (Central Ayrshire) (SNP)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is obviously a lively debate on both sides of the House. As someone who is not long from being on the front line, as a surgeon in the NHS, I find it a bit sad to listen to how angry this debate is. The four-hour target should be a tool and not an end in itself. It is used to take the temperature and to understand what is happening underneath. We would not shove a patient in a bath of ice water if they had a temperature; we would look for the infection, try to understand it and try to treat it. Unfortunately, the four-hour target has simply become a stick, and today that stick just seemed to be being thrown backwards and forwards.

People working in A&E face great difficulty, which is why we are not recruiting trainees to A&E and why we are losing senior doctors at an incredible rate from A&E. Instead of being one of the most rewarding places to work, people see it as the most miserable.

Dawn Butler Portrait Dawn Butler
- Hansard - -

Although the target is used as a measure, or to take the temperature, does the hon. Lady not feel that the fact that it has gone up 401% since 2009-10 is something to be worried about?

Philippa Whitford Portrait Dr Whitford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Did the hon. Lady say that the target has gone up 401%?

Dawn Butler Portrait Dawn Butler
- Hansard - -

The time that people have had to wait for four hours has gone up—