Energy Company Charges Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

David Hamilton

Main Page: David Hamilton (Labour - Midlothian)
Tuesday 4th February 2014

(10 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Albert Owen Portrait Albert Owen
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Absolutely—that was my next point. These people are in vulnerable positions—not only those in houses in multiple occupation but those in rural areas. I know small estates in my area where people have these very high payments and are unable to get the best tariffs. It is a bit of a con. Although we passed the legislation and had those debates, it is worth putting this in its proper context, and I thank the hon. Gentleman for his intervention.

David Hamilton Portrait Mr David Hamilton (Midlothian) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

As regards the price freeze that Labour is proposing, does my hon. Friend agree that a member of any party that does not agree with it, such as the Scottish National party, has to be asked in their constituency why that is?

Albert Owen Portrait Albert Owen
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The purpose of the proposed price freeze, which is not the main theme of this debate, is to have a pause, take stock, get the regulator to look at the issues and think about future legislation. I believe that we are where we are because of rushed legislation to privatise both gas and electricity, which created the wrong starting point for an energy market.

Many people on prepaid meters will never be on the cheapest tariff, and that fact was never addressed by the Government when the Energy Act 2013 made its way through Parliament. I want to concentrate on those who are hardest hit by the price discrimination to which the motion refers. They are really struggling with their bills and I make no apology for highlighting that fact time and again. Many of my constituents do not have the best prices. They also have lower incomes and higher transport costs in rural areas, which all adds up to a cost of living crisis.