Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Oral Answers to Questions

David Duguid Excerpts
Monday 26th February 2024

(8 months, 4 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Chris Philp Portrait Chris Philp
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I said, my colleagues in the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities are providing extremely comprehensive packages of support. Rough sleeping is down by 35% since 2017 and by 28% since before the pandemic in 2019. The Government are willing to look at changes to make these provisions tightly defined and narrow. The intention is to use criminal sanctions only as a last resort where rough sleeping is disrupting a business, for example, and preventing it from operating. It is a last resort—the first resort will always be offering help and support.

David Duguid Portrait David Duguid (Banff and Buchan) (Con)
- Hansard - -

4. What steps he is taking to reduce levels of legal migration.

Sarah Dines Portrait Miss Sarah Dines (Derbyshire Dales) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

7. What steps he is taking to reduce levels of legal migration.

Tom Pursglove Portrait The Minister for Legal Migration and the Border (Tom Pursglove)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

On 4 December, the Government announced a package of new measures to further reduce net migration, including but not limited to stopping overseas care workers bringing family dependants, increasing the salary threshold for skilled worker visas to £38,700 and raising the minimum income requirement for family visas in stages to £38,700. The changes are being introduced gradually from early 2024 and are not retrospective.

David Duguid Portrait David Duguid
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I welcome the measures taken to reduce abuses of the immigration system, but I also recognise the need to exempt critical occupations where we have a specific shortage from the new minimum salary, for example health and care workers. However, in the Migration Advisory Committee’s interim review of the immigration salary list, published on Friday, several occupations have been removed because a discounted salary of around £31,000 is well above the going rate for such occupations. Given the vital and growing importance of food security across the country, will my hon. Friend commit to a review of those occupations which, although not the highest tech or highest paid jobs in our economy, are none the less critical for our food sector and our rural and coastal communities?