David Cairns
Main Page: David Cairns (Labour - Inverclyde)Department Debates - View all David Cairns's debates with the Cabinet Office
(15Ā years, 7Ā months ago)
Commons ChamberMy hon. Friend makes a good point, which is that when this happened a very bad message was sent about what we stand for in the UK and our views in terms of the response to such a heinous crime. It is important to bear that in mind, and as I said in my statement, I do not think that enough thought was given to that, which in the end is the most precious of all judgments that Ministers should make.
David Cairns (Inverclyde) (Lab)
As the Minister of State in the Scotland Office at the time, and as Mr Megrahiās constituency MP, I strongly agree with the Prime Minister that Mr Megrahi should have spent the rest of his natural life in prison. Does he agree with me that however ill-considered and ill-judged phrases such as āour game plan on Megrahiā may beāhad anyone approached me with such a game plan, I would have told them where they could put itāit must not obscure the central fact that it was a decision that was taken, and could only ever have been taken, by Scottish Government Ministers? There was no collusion, no cover-up and no conspiracy, just a bad decision by the SNP.
I go a long way with the hon. Gentleman, who I think made the right judgment about the release of Megrahi. The problem, and this comes out in the report, is that memos submitted to Ministers in the Foreign Office included things like,
āFacilitating direct contact between the Libyans and the Scottish Executive is a key part of our game plan on Megrahiā,
and that submission was subsequently agreed by the Minister. That is the point. The language about facilitating contacts that was put into memos was subsequently agreed by Ministers, including the former Foreign Secretary, and we were not told about that in the House of Commons. That is an issue that needs to be addressed.