Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Dave Robertson and Torsten Bell
Tuesday 27th January 2026

(1 week, 3 days ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Torsten Bell Portrait Torsten Bell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Mr Speaker, that is called leading with your chin. Members on the Conservative Benches were in power in the last Parliament, which saw living standards fall by 2.9%. Living standards have already risen under this Government by 1.5%, because we are turning around their mess day after day after day.

Dave Robertson Portrait Dave Robertson (Lichfield) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

8. What steps she is taking to providing funding for rail infrastructure.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Dave Robertson and Torsten Bell
Tuesday 9th December 2025

(1 month, 4 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Dave Robertson Portrait Dave Robertson (Lichfield) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Constituents across Lichfield, Burntwood and the villages will be pleased to see the Government taking action on the cost of living by reducing energy bills, but they want the benefits to be fair and felt by all bill payers. What steps will the Chancellor take with Cabinet colleagues to ensure that reductions in energy bills are reflected in standing charges, not just in unit prices?

Torsten Bell Portrait The Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury (Torsten Bell)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Energy bills are too high. The Conservatives left Britain dependent on the rollercoaster of gas prices, and left families paying almost £2 billion on bills for their failed energy efficiency scheme, the energy company obligation. We are scrapping ECO and taking some of the expensive levies off bills. My hon. Friend makes an important point about standing charges. He will know that Ofgem continues to consider low standing charge tariffs for exactly the reason that he raises. More generally, reducing energy bills is so important precisely because they are typically a higher share of disposable income for low-income households.